Wabbels B, Schiefer U, Treutwein B, Benda N, Stercken-Sorrenti G
Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul;4(4):217-21.
Conventional perimeters use bright stimuli. In this study, dark stimuli were also used. Dark stimuli are employed for testing due to their lack of effects of local scatter and are utilized with the purpose of preferentially stimulating the off-system, but their presentation with optical methods is difficult. This problem is solved by the use of a computer monitor. The objective of this study was to compare directly measurements obtained with bright and dark stimuli. Therefore, the central 30 degrees of the visual field of ten subjects with no ophthalmologic pathology was examined with bright and dark stimuli (size 10- and 30-min-of-arc). Threshold estimation was performed with the 4/2 method. Concerning the 10-min-of-arc dark stimulus, no measurement outside the central 15 degrees could be performed because of insufficient dynamic range (sometimes even the darkest stimulus was not seen). Comparing the results obtained using bright and dark stimuli of the same size, we could not find a significant difference in sensitivity for this age group.
传统视野计使用明亮刺激。在本研究中,也使用了暗刺激。暗刺激因其缺乏局部散射效应而被用于测试,其目的是优先刺激离系统,但用光学方法呈现暗刺激很困难。使用计算机显示器解决了这个问题。本研究的目的是直接比较用明亮和暗刺激获得的测量结果。因此,对十名无眼科病变受试者的中央30度视野用明亮和暗刺激(10分和30分视角大小)进行检查。用4/2方法进行阈值估计。对于10分视角的暗刺激,由于动态范围不足,无法在中央15度以外进行测量(有时甚至最暗的刺激也看不见)。比较相同大小的明亮和暗刺激所获得的结果,我们发现该年龄组的敏感性没有显著差异。