Bevanger L, Maeland J A, Kvan A I
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Trondheim, Norway.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1994 Mar;1(2):238-40. doi: 10.1128/cdli.1.2.238-240.1994.
Approximately 8 years after treatment for tularemia, 14 of 22 (63.6%) individuals tested still had a positive microagglutination test for Francisella tularensis antibodies. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-F. tularensis outer membrane antibodies was positive for 55% (immunoglobulin A [IgA]), 95% (IgG), and 27% (IgM) of the late-phase sera, but with antibody levels significantly reduced from those in the acute-phase sera. IgG and IgA antibody levels in the late-phase sera showed significant correlation with levels in the acute-phase sera. The IgG/IgM ratio calculation discriminated between acute-phase and persistent antibodies for most sera, but Western blot (immunoblot) patterns did not. Immunoblotting indicated that the F. tularensis lipopolysaccharide is a major target for antibodies in both groups of sera. Our results substantiate the need for caution in the interpretation of positive serological test results for tularemia, which could result from disease occurring years earlier.
在治疗兔热病约8年后,22名接受检测的个体中有14名(63.6%)对土拉弗朗西斯菌抗体的微量凝集试验仍呈阳性。抗土拉弗朗西斯菌外膜抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定显示,55%(免疫球蛋白A [IgA])、95%(IgG)和27%(IgM)的晚期血清呈阳性,但抗体水平比急性期血清中的显著降低。晚期血清中的IgG和IgA抗体水平与急性期血清中的水平呈显著相关。对于大多数血清,IgG/IgM比值计算可区分急性期和持续性抗体,但蛋白质印迹(免疫印迹)模式则不能。免疫印迹表明,土拉弗朗西斯菌脂多糖是两组血清中抗体的主要靶点。我们的结果证实,在解释兔热病血清学检测阳性结果时需要谨慎,因为这可能是数年前发生的疾病所致。