• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定子宫颈筛查故障安全机制的标准:基于细胞病理学实验室记录审核的目标。

Setting standards for cervical screening fail-safe mechanisms: a target based on an audit of cytopathology laboratory records.

作者信息

Roberts E, Cook G A, Walsworth-Bell J P, Barrow S

机构信息

North West Surveys and Research, Manchester Health Authority, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 1995;2(2):102-4. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200210.

DOI:10.1177/096914139500200210
PMID:7497153
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of cytopathology laboratories in monitoring action following an abnormal cervical smear.

SETTING

11 screening laboratories serving 19 districts in the former North Western region of the United Kingdom.

METHOD

944 validated cases were identified at 11 laboratories. The screening history for each abnormal smear was obtained from the screening laboratory and compared with the records from the relevant family health services authority (FHSA) database.

RESULTS

Laboratories held complete follow up records in 740 (78.4%) cases; the FHSA records extended this to 910 (96.4%) cases. Poor communication was the main problem; computerisation was not necessary to improve fail-safe procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Audit of fail-safe procedures is a valuable purchasing tool, identifying weaknesses and strengths, setting and maintaining standards.

摘要

目的

研究细胞病理学实验室在监测宫颈涂片异常后的行动效果。

背景

为英国前西北地区19个区服务的11个筛查实验室。

方法

在11个实验室识别出944例经过验证的病例。从筛查实验室获取每个异常涂片的筛查历史,并与相关家庭健康服务机构(FHSA)数据库的记录进行比较。

结果

实验室保存了740例(78.4%)病例的完整随访记录;FHSA的记录将这一比例扩大到910例(96.4%)。沟通不畅是主要问题;计算机化对于改进故障安全程序并非必要。

结论

对故障安全程序的审核是一种有价值的采购工具,可识别弱点和优势,设定并维持标准。

相似文献

1
Setting standards for cervical screening fail-safe mechanisms: a target based on an audit of cytopathology laboratory records.制定子宫颈筛查故障安全机制的标准:基于细胞病理学实验室记录审核的目标。
J Med Screen. 1995;2(2):102-4. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200210.
2
Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.宫颈细胞病理学中的质量保证
Cytopathology. 1997 Aug;8(4):290-2.
3
Problems with audit in cervical cytology.宫颈细胞学检查中的审计问题。
Cytopathology. 2000 Jun;11(3):200-1. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00254.x.
4
Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective.从公共卫生角度看宫颈癌筛查
Acta Cytol. 1989 Jul-Aug;33(4):471-4.
5
Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Cytopathology. 1995 Oct;6(5):301-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1995.tb00575.x.
6
[Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].[关于2008年第28卷第4期的社论。“哥伦比亚的宫颈癌控制:基于细胞学项目的成就与挑战”]
Biomedica. 2009 Mar;29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3.
7
Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.宫颈细胞学实验室的监管关闭:公共卫生应对建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 Dec 19;46(RR-17):1-19.
8
The false-negative fraction: a statistical method to measure the efficacy of cervical smear screening laboratories.假阴性率:一种衡量宫颈涂片筛查实验室效能的统计方法。
Mil Med. 1999 Jun;164(6):410-1.
9
Quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: results of a proficiency testing scheme for cytology laboratories in the north west Thames region.宫颈癌筛查中的质量保证:泰晤士河西北地区细胞学实验室能力验证计划的结果
Cytopathology. 1994 Aug;5(4):197-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00420.x.
10
European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme.《子宫颈癌筛查质量保证欧洲指南》。欧洲抗癌计划。
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A Suppl 4:S1-38.