Gifford C, Coleman D V
Department of Cytopathology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Cytopathology. 1994 Aug;5(4):197-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00420.x.
To examine the effectiveness of introducing External Quality Assessment (EQA) into all laboratories which undertake gynaecological cytopathology. To assess pathologists and cytotechnologists regularly for their competence to screen cervical smears, regardless of their standing in the laboratory hierarchy or their experience of gynaecological cytopathology.
Each participant was asked to screen and report on 10 slides during a 2 h period. The assessment was carried out by a facilitator under the direction of a specially appointed EQA Committee. A maximum score of 20 points was awarded for a completely correct set of answers. A minus score was awarded for a missed abnormal smear. Seventeen pathology laboratories in North West Thames Regional Health Authority participated; 146 cytologists were assessed.
A pilot and four rounds of EQA have been completed and a total 5350 smears examined. Out of 2568 dyskaryotic (abnormal) smears screened, 0.7% were not identified correctly. Of the 146 cytologists taking part in the assessment, 95% achieved a score of 17 or more. Three participants were identified who did not reach an acceptable level of competence and appropriate remedial action was taken.
The EQA scheme detected unacceptable levels of performance which can be quickly rectified. Participation of 100% has been maintained on a voluntary basis, and 4 years experience of the scheme confirms that a very high standard of screening prevails in the Region. The study illustrates that voluntary self-regulation is acceptable in the NHS, and the introduction of similar EQA schemes on a national scale will go a long way to establishing confidence in the cervical cancer screening programme.
探讨在所有开展妇科细胞病理学检查的实验室引入外部质量评估(EQA)的有效性。定期评估病理学家和细胞技术人员筛查宫颈涂片的能力,无论其在实验室层级中的地位或妇科细胞病理学经验如何。
要求每位参与者在2小时内筛查并报告10张玻片。评估由一名协调员在特别指定的EQA委员会指导下进行。一组完全正确的答案最高可获20分。漏检异常涂片则给予负分。泰晤士河北部地区卫生局的17家病理实验室参与其中;146名细胞学家接受了评估。
已完成一次试点和四轮EQA,共检查了5350张涂片。在筛查的2568张异常涂片(核异质涂片)中,0.7%未被正确识别。在参与评估的146名细胞学家中,95%的得分达到17分或更高。发现有三名参与者未达到可接受的能力水平,并采取了适当的补救措施。
EQA计划检测到了不可接受的表现水平,这些问题可迅速得到纠正。该计划在自愿基础上保持了100%的参与率,4年的经验证实该地区的筛查标准非常高。该研究表明,国民保健制度中自愿自我监管是可行的,在全国范围内引入类似的EQA计划将大大有助于建立对宫颈癌筛查计划的信心。