Slaughter P M, Chetty R, Flintoft V F, Lewis S, Sykora K, Beattie D M, Schwartz L
Toronto Hospital, Ontario.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995 Mar;34(3):210-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810340106.
We undertook a randomized controlled trial comparing VasoSeal, a collagen vascular hemostasis device (VHD), with manual compression to assess its role and potential cost savings in the PTCA population. Of 460 patients, 359 were excluded due to clinical instability (30%), groin problems (18%), suboptimal PTCA result (15%), and other reasons (37%). The remaining 101 patients were randomized to either VHD (51) or manual compression (50). Hemostasis time, time to ambulation, duration of hospital stay, and nursing time and intensity were significantly reduced in the VHD group. There were no major groin complications in either treatment arm but there was a trend toward more minor groin complications in the VHD patients. The application of VasoSeal reduced resource use in this randomized study and may translate into significant cost reductions in the general coronary angioplasty population.
我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了胶原蛋白血管止血装置(VHD)VasoSeal与手动压迫止血,以评估其在经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)人群中的作用及潜在的成本节约情况。在460例患者中,359例因临床不稳定(30%)、腹股沟问题(18%)、PTCA效果欠佳(15%)及其他原因(37%)被排除。其余101例患者被随机分为VHD组(51例)和手动压迫止血组(50例)。VHD组的止血时间、下床活动时间、住院时间以及护理时间和强度均显著缩短。两个治疗组均未出现严重的腹股沟并发症,但VHD组患者出现轻微腹股沟并发症的趋势更明显。在这项随机研究中,VasoSeal的应用减少了资源使用,这可能会在一般冠状动脉成形术人群中带来显著的成本降低。