Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮

Systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Hay E M

机构信息

Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Centre, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

出版信息

Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995 Aug;9(3):437-70. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80252-3.

Abstract

Assessing patients with SLE is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the disease. The Revised 1982 ARA Classification Criteria set has been widely accepted for classifying SLE patients for inclusion in clinical studies, but it is not appropriate for making the diagnosis of SLE in an individual and is not helpful for classifying patients with early or mild disease in population based epidemiological studies. Further refinement of this criteria set to meet these objectives and to facilitate subdivision of patients with SLE into those with similar clinical, serological or genetic features poses a future challenge for the clinical epidemiologist. A number of valid and reliable indices are available for measuring clinical disease activity in SLE (Table 3). Despite their different approaches they have been shown to correlate well with each other and hence would appear to be measuring the same thing. The exact choice of instrument will be dictated by the purpose for which it is required. Although none is perfect they are useful for monitoring groups of patients in outcome studies in a research setting. Practically, disease activity indices are unlikely to be appropriate for dictating treatment decisions in individual cases: an instrument comprehensive and flexible enough for this purpose would undoubtedly be far too cumbersome for widespread use. Ultimately such fine tuning will continue to rely upon the skill and intuition of experienced physicians.

摘要

评估系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者具有挑战性,因为该疾病具有异质性。1982年修订的美国风湿病学会(ARA)分类标准集已被广泛接受,用于在临床研究中对SLE患者进行分类,但它不适用于个体SLE的诊断,在基于人群的流行病学研究中也无助于对早期或轻度疾病患者进行分类。进一步完善该标准集以实现这些目标,并便于将SLE患者细分为具有相似临床、血清学或遗传特征的患者,这对临床流行病学家来说是未来的一项挑战。有许多有效且可靠的指标可用于衡量SLE的临床疾病活动度(表3)。尽管它们的方法不同,但已证明它们之间具有良好的相关性,因此似乎衡量的是同一事物。具体选择哪种工具将取决于其使用目的。虽然没有一种是完美的,但它们在研究环境中对监测结果研究中的患者群体很有用。实际上,疾病活动指数不太可能适用于指导个别病例的治疗决策:为此目的足够全面和灵活的工具无疑会过于繁琐而无法广泛使用。最终,这种微调将继续依赖经验丰富的医生的技能和直觉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验