• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统性红斑狼疮分类标准贡献的评估。

Evaluation of criteria contributions for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Somogyi L, Cikes N, Marusić M

机构信息

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Scand J Rheumatol. 1993;22(2):58-62. doi: 10.3109/03009749309095116.

DOI:10.3109/03009749309095116
PMID:8480139
Abstract

The American Rheumatism Association (ACR) preliminary and revised criteria for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were evaluated for sensitivity and specificity in a population of 100 patients with SLE and 100 patients with other rheumatic diseases. Bayes' theorem was applied for evaluation of ARA criteria for the classification of SLE and a scoring system was developed which allows simple determination of the probability of SLE. The evaluation revealed considerable differences in values of the ARA criteria. The serologic tests and discoid lupus appeared to be the most distinctive criteria, while Raynaud's phenomenon, oral and nasal ulcers and arthritis were of little value. Comparison of SLE and control patients presenting the same number of criteria revealed that patients with SLE exhibit more distinctive criteria. This finding emphasizes the need for a quantitative evaluation of classification criteria.

摘要

对美国风湿病协会(ACR)系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类的初步及修订标准,在100例SLE患者和100例其他风湿性疾病患者群体中进行了敏感性和特异性评估。应用贝叶斯定理评估ARA标准对SLE的分类情况,并开发了一个评分系统,该系统能简单地确定SLE的概率。评估显示ARA标准的值存在显著差异。血清学检查和盘状狼疮似乎是最具特异性的标准,而雷诺现象、口腔和鼻溃疡以及关节炎的价值不大。对具有相同标准数量的SLE患者和对照患者进行比较发现,SLE患者表现出更具特异性的标准。这一发现强调了对分类标准进行定量评估的必要性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of criteria contributions for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮分类标准贡献的评估。
Scand J Rheumatol. 1993;22(2):58-62. doi: 10.3109/03009749309095116.
2
Weighted criteria for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Arch Intern Med. 1984 Feb;144(2):281-5.
3
A comparison of the specificity of the 1971 and 1982 American Rheumatism Association criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.1971年和1982年美国风湿病协会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准特异性的比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Jun;28(6):620-3. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280604.
4
Application of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria in clinical practice: a single center experience.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在临床实践中的应用:单中心经验。
Lupus. 2020 Apr;29(4):421-425. doi: 10.1177/0961203320908939. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Defining lupus cases for clinical studies: the Boston weighted criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.为临床研究定义狼疮病例:系统性红斑狼疮分类的波士顿加权标准。
J Rheumatol. 2002 Dec;29(12):2545-50.
6
ARA and EADV criteria for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.皮肤型红斑狼疮患者系统性红斑狼疮分类的ARA和EADV标准。
Dermatology. 1997;194(3):217-20. doi: 10.1159/000246105.
7
In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment.在一个早期 SLE 队列中,ACR-1997、SLICC-2012 和 EULAR/ACR-2019 标准将患者分为不重叠的组:使用所有三个标准可确保在修改早期分类和治疗时为临床研究提供最佳的捕获。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):232-241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216155. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
8
A comparison of the sensitivity of the 1971 and 1982 American Rheumatism Association criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.1971年和1982年美国风湿病协会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的敏感性比较。
Arthritis Rheum. 1984 May;27(5):530-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270508.
9
The use of SLICC and ACR criteria to correctly label patients with cutaneous lupus and systemic lupus erythematosus.采用 SLICC 和 ACR 标准正确标记患有皮肤狼疮和系统性红斑狼疮的患者。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;37(3):817-818. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-3999-0. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria to determine the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE).采用美国风湿病学会(ACR)和系统性红斑狼疮国际协作诊所(SLICC)的标准来确定亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮(SCLE)患者的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)诊断。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 May;74(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus on a patient cohort from a national referral center: a retrospective study.基于一家国家转诊中心患者队列对系统性红斑狼疮新分类标准的验证:一项回顾性研究。
Croat Med J. 2019 Aug 31;60(4):333-344. doi: 10.3325/CroatMedJ_60_0325.
2
Impairment and Differential Expression of PR3 and MPO on Peripheral Myelomonocytic Cells with Endothelial Properties in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.显微镜下多血管炎中具有内皮特性的外周髓单核细胞上蛋白酶3(PR3)和髓过氧化物酶(MPO)的损伤及差异表达
Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012:715049. doi: 10.1155/2012/715049. Epub 2012 Jun 26.