Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术中髌骨表面置换与不置换的比较。

Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement.

作者信息

Bourne R B, Rorabeck C H, Vaz M, Kramer J, Hardie R, Robertson D

机构信息

University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec(321):156-61.

PMID:7497662
Abstract

One hundred patients with osteoarthritic knees were randomized either to have their patella resurfaced or not resurfaced using the same total knee replacement. These patients were assessed preoperatively and a minimum 2 years postoperatively using disease-specific (Knee Society Clinical Rating System) and functional capacity (30 second stair climbing and knee flexor and extensor torques) outcome measures. Two patients in the not resurfaced group required reoperation because of anterior knee pain. At 2 years' followup, the not resurfaced group had significantly less pain and better knee flexor torques than did the resurfaced group, whereas the results of the Knee Society Function Scores, 30 second stair climbing, and knee extensor torques were similar. These results suggest that longer-term followup is required, but that one should keep an open mind regarding patellar resurfacing during total knee replacement.

摘要

100例膝骨关节炎患者被随机分为两组,一组在进行全膝关节置换时对髌骨进行表面置换,另一组则不进行髌骨表面置换。术前及术后至少2年,使用疾病特异性(膝关节协会临床评分系统)和功能能力(30秒爬楼梯以及膝关节屈伸扭矩)指标对这些患者进行评估。未进行髌骨表面置换组中有2例患者因膝前疼痛需要再次手术。在2年的随访中,未进行髌骨表面置换组的疼痛明显减轻,膝关节屈肌扭矩优于进行髌骨表面置换组,而膝关节协会功能评分、30秒爬楼梯测试结果以及膝关节伸肌扭矩在两组中相似。这些结果表明需要进行更长时间的随访,但在全膝关节置换过程中对于髌骨表面置换应持开放态度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验