Von Lubitz D K, Kim J, Beenhakker M, Carter M F, Lin R C, Meshulam Y, Daly J W, Shi D, Zhou L M, Jacobson K A
NIH, NIDDK, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Sep 5;283(1-3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00338-l.
It is known that stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors has a modulatory effect on the excitability of postsynaptic NMDA receptors. Conversely, acute stimulation of NMDA receptors results in release of adenosine via calcium-independent mechanisms. These findings indicate a close functional relationship between these receptors. It is, therefore, possible that chronic, low level stimulation of the NMDA receptor may have a negative impact on these modulatory processes. To investigate this possibility, we have subjected C57BL mice either to an acute injection of a N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 0.01 mg/kg) or deoxycoformycin (1 mg/kg) followed by a convulsant dose of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) (60 mg/kg) or to chronic, low level (20 mg/kg i.p. daily) exposure to NMDA for 8 weeks. One day after the last injection of NMDA, animals were injected either with a convulsant dose of NMDA alone, or with either CPA at 0.001 or 0.01 mg/kg, or with 1 mg/kg deoxycoformycin followed 15 min later by 60 mg/kg NMDA. Neither CPA nor deoxycoformycin were protective when NMDA was given acutely at 60 mg/kg. Chronic treatment with NMDA alone or chronic administration of NMDA followed by 0.001 mg/kg CPA had no significant effect on mortality following a convulsant dose of NMDA. However, when the chronic regimen of NMDA was followed by either 0.01 mg/kg CPA or 1 mg/kg deoxycoformycin, mortality was reduced to 10% (CPA), or eliminated completely (deoxycoformycin). Moreover, combination of chronic NMDA treatment with either CPA (both doses) or deoxycoformycin produced a significant improvement in other measures, i.e., seizure onset, intensity of neurological impairment, and extension of time to death.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
已知腺苷A1受体的刺激对突触后NMDA受体的兴奋性具有调节作用。相反,NMDA受体的急性刺激会通过钙非依赖性机制导致腺苷释放。这些发现表明这些受体之间存在密切的功能关系。因此,NMDA受体的慢性低水平刺激可能会对这些调节过程产生负面影响。为了研究这种可能性,我们对C57BL小鼠进行了以下处理:要么急性注射N6-环戊基腺苷(CPA,0.01 mg/kg)或脱氧助间型霉素(1 mg/kg),随后给予惊厥剂量的N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)(60 mg/kg);要么慢性低水平(每天腹腔注射20 mg/kg)暴露于NMDA 8周。在最后一次注射NMDA一天后,给动物单独注射惊厥剂量的NMDA,或注射0.001或0.01 mg/kg的CPA,或注射1 mg/kg脱氧助间型霉素,15分钟后再注射60 mg/kg NMDA。当以60 mg/kg急性给予NMDA时,CPA和脱氧助间型霉素均无保护作用。单独慢性给予NMDA或慢性给予NMDA后再给予0.001 mg/kg CPA对惊厥剂量的NMDA后的死亡率没有显著影响。然而,当慢性NMDA方案后给予0.01 mg/kg CPA或1 mg/kg脱氧助间型霉素时,死亡率降至10%(CPA)或完全消除(脱氧助间型霉素)。此外,慢性NMDA治疗与CPA(两种剂量)或脱氧助间型霉素联合使用在其他指标上有显著改善,即癫痫发作起始、神经功能损害强度和死亡时间延长。(摘要截断于250字)