Plath P
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1978 Nov 22;219(2):414-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00463863.
In cases of noise induced hearing loss, the medicolegal judgement of causality often is complicated by the coincidence of endogenous hearing impairments, which conceal the audiological characteristis and the degree of Nihl. The recognition of an occupational disease however is possible only when there is a dominant probability; the possibility of Nihl alone in sight of the labour conditions is not sufficient for this recognition. In such cases, the medical expert therefore, besides of an extensive audiological analysis, must have sufficient information on noise immission, on the course of hearing impairment in regard to working time, and on other diseases and accidents which possibly can influence hearing function.
在噪声性听力损失的案例中,因果关系的法医学判定常常因内源性听力障碍的并存而变得复杂,这些内源性听力障碍掩盖了噪声性听力损失的听力学特征和程度。然而,只有当存在显著可能性时,才能认定为职业病;仅考虑劳动条件下存在噪声性听力损失的可能性并不足以做出这种认定。因此,在这类案例中,医学专家除了进行广泛的听力学分析外,还必须掌握关于噪声暴露、与工作时间相关的听力损伤过程以及其他可能影响听力功能的疾病和事故的充分信息。