Puig J G, Ruilope L M, Ortega R
Division of Internal Medicine, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Hypertension. 1995 Dec;26(6 Pt 2):1093-9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.1093.
Whole-day ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is used to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension and assess the response to antihypertensive therapy. Neither of these has been applied to patients with type II diabetes mellitus, in whom it has been proposed that the desirable blood pressure should be lower than in nondiabetics. This multicenter study was designed to examine whether there are differences in the efficacy of a first-line antihypertensive drug when assessed by casual and ambulatory blood pressure determinations in patients with type II diabetes mellitus in whom 24-hour ambulatory monitoring confirms or fails to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension. Forty-three patients (mean age, 57.7 years) with stable type II diabetes mellitus and mild hypertension (casual diastolic pressure, 90 to 104 mm Hg on at least two visits) were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (benazepril, 10 to 20 mg, once a day) for 8 weeks. Antihypertensive drug efficacy was assessed by casual (trough) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Diabetic patients were classified as nonconfirmed hypertensive if the mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic pressure was below 85 mm Hg. Antihypertensive treatment significantly decreased both systolic and diastolic pressures when determined by either casual measurement (from a mean of 162.7/98.0 to 153.9/89.2 mm Hg; P < .001) or ambulatory monitoring (from a mean of 143.1/84.4 to 137.0/81.5 mm Hg; P < .05). Twenty-one patients (49%) were classified as confirmed hypertensive and 22 as nonconfirmed hypertensive. In confirmed hypertensive patients benazepril significantly reduced systolic and diastolic pressures when assessed by either casual or 24-hour ambulatory monitoring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
动态血压监测用于确诊高血压并评估抗高血压治疗的效果。这两种用途均未应用于II型糖尿病患者,有人提出这类患者的理想血压应低于非糖尿病患者。这项多中心研究旨在探讨在II型糖尿病患者中,通过偶测血压和动态血压测定评估一线抗高血压药物疗效时是否存在差异,这些患者经24小时动态监测确诊或未确诊高血压。43例稳定型II型糖尿病和轻度高血压患者(平均年龄57.7岁,至少两次就诊时偶测舒张压为90至104 mmHg)接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(苯那普利,10至20 mg,每日一次)治疗8周。通过偶测(谷值)血压和24小时动态血压监测评估抗高血压药物疗效。如果24小时动态舒张压平均值低于85 mmHg,糖尿病患者被分类为未确诊高血压。无论通过偶测(从平均162.7/98.0降至153.9/89.2 mmHg;P <.001)还是动态监测(从平均143.1/84.4降至137.0/81.5 mmHg;P <.05),抗高血压治疗均显著降低收缩压和舒张压。21例患者(49%)被分类为确诊高血压,22例为未确诊高血压。在确诊高血压患者中,无论通过偶测还是24小时动态监测评估,苯那普利均显著降低收缩压和舒张压。(摘要截选至250词)