Suppr超能文献

在一项随机交叉研究中三种不同口服环磷酰胺制剂的药理学、相对生物利用度及毒性

Pharmacology, relative bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral cyclophosphamide preparations in a randomized, cross-over study.

作者信息

Stewart D J, Morgan L R, Verma S, Maroun J A, Thibault M

机构信息

Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Civic Division, Canada.

出版信息

Invest New Drugs. 1995;13(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/BF02614228.

Abstract

Thirty-six patients were entered on this study to determine the pharmacology, bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral formulations of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Endoxan, and an investigational direct compression tablet). Patients were randomized with respect to the order in which they received the different oral cyclophosphamide preparations, and received each one for two weeks followed by a two week washout period. Concurrent chemotherapy was allowed provided it remained constant across all 3 courses of cyclophosphamide. Plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard were measured by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Peak plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations and times to peak plasma cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard preparations were significantly greater for Endoxan than for Cytoxan and the investigational direct compression tablet. Drug area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), bioavailability, and plasma elimination half-life could not be reliably calculated for Endoxan but were similar for Cytoxan and the investigational formulation. Based on AUC comparisons, bioavailability of parent compound (relative to an oral cyclophosphamide solution) was 85% for Cytoxan and 69% for the investigational formulation. This difference was not significant. There were no significant differences between the 3 formulations with respect to any individual type of toxicity, although the investigational formulation tended to be associated with somewhat less overall toxicity (p = 0.08).

摘要

36名患者参与了本研究,以确定三种不同口服制剂的环磷酰胺(癌得星、恩度赛恩和一种研究用直接压片)的药理学、生物利用度和毒性。患者根据接受不同口服环磷酰胺制剂的顺序进行随机分组,并每种制剂服用两周,随后有两周的洗脱期。允许进行同步化疗,前提是在环磷酰胺的所有三个疗程中保持不变。采用电子捕获检测气相色谱法测定环磷酰胺和磷酰胺氮芥的血浆浓度。恩度赛恩的血浆环磷酰胺峰值浓度以及达到血浆环磷酰胺和磷酰胺氮芥峰值的时间显著高于癌得星和研究用直接压片。恩度赛恩的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)、生物利用度和血浆消除半衰期无法可靠计算,但癌得星和研究用制剂的结果相似。基于AUC比较,癌得星母体化合物的生物利用度(相对于口服环磷酰胺溶液)为85%,研究用制剂为69%。这种差异不显著。三种制剂在任何个体毒性类型方面均无显著差异,尽管研究用制剂的总体毒性倾向于略低(p = 0.08)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验