Kopp K C, Johnson J A
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry 60612-7212, USA.
J Dent Educ. 1995 Aug;59(8):824-9.
The agreement between standardized patients' (SPs) and faculty in scoring student performance is an important component in determining the accuracy of SP assessment scores. For this study, checklist scores completed by SPs were compared to checklists completed by faculty. The SPs completed the checklists immediately following each SP-student interaction. Faculty reviewed videotapes from randomly selected interactions and completed the same checklists as the SPs. Overall, agreement between SPs and faculty ranged between 81 percent and 92 percent, with a mean of 86 percent. The interpersonal skills agreement ranged from 78 percent to 97 percent and technical skills from 82 percent to 89 percent. Agreement between SPs and faculty was good especially in later cases. Discrepancies were most often due to SPs assigning credit when the faculty did not. This study supports the use of SPs as accurate, relatively inexpensive, and feasible recorders of student performance for selected skills.
标准化病人（SPs）与教员在对学生表现进行评分方面的一致性，是确定SP评估分数准确性的一个重要组成部分。在本研究中，将SPs完成的检查表分数与教员完成的检查表进行了比较。SPs在每次与学生互动后立即完成检查表。教员查看了随机挑选的互动录像，并完成了与SPs相同的检查表。总体而言，SPs与教员之间的一致性在81%至92%之间，平均为86%。人际技能的一致性在78%至97%之间，技术技能的一致性在82%至89%之间。SPs与教员之间的一致性在后期案例中尤其良好。差异最常是由于SPs给予了教员未给予的分数。本研究支持将SPs用作对选定技能的学生表现进行准确、相对廉价且可行的记录者。
