• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声洁治时器械功率设置对治疗效果的影响。

Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome.

作者信息

Chapple I L, Walmsley A D, Saxby M S, Moscrop H

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1995 Sep;66(9):756-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.9.756.

DOI:10.1902/jop.1995.66.9.756
PMID:7500240
Abstract

Ultrasonic scalers may be operated at different power settings which may influence the final therapeutic result. The displacement amplitude of the scaling tip may affect scaling efficiency or the degree of root surface damage. This investigation aimed to determine whether there was any difference in periodontal healing, as assessed by standard clinical methods, when an ultrasonic scaler was operated at full or half power in patients suffering from mild to moderate adult periodontitis. Seventeen patients with chronic adult periodontitis were entered into the study and a split mouth design utilized. Quadrant allocation was randomized, 2 quadrants being treated at full power and 2 at half power. At baseline, probing attachment levels, bleeding and plaque indices (BI and PI) were recorded and oral hygiene instruction given. Two weeks later all measurements were repeated and further recordings made at 1, 3, and 6 months post-therapy. Statistical analysis demonstrated no differences between groups at baseline (P > 0.3) for all parameters. At the post-oral hygiene stage, there were significant attachment gains for both experimental groups (P < 0.04), but no differences were found between the groups (P > 0.6). At 6 months, mean attachment gains for the half power and full power groups over baseline measures were 0.5 +/- 0.5 mm and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively (P < 0.002), and there were no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.5). The results show that the use of the half power setting was as effective as using the ultrasonic scaler at full power.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

超声洁牙机可在不同功率设置下操作,这可能会影响最终的治疗效果。洁治头的位移幅度可能会影响洁治效率或牙根表面损伤程度。本研究旨在确定,在患有轻度至中度成人牙周炎的患者中,当超声洁牙机以全功率或半功率操作时,通过标准临床方法评估的牙周愈合情况是否存在差异。17名慢性成人牙周炎患者进入本研究,并采用了对侧半口设计。象限分配是随机的,两个象限采用全功率治疗,两个象限采用半功率治疗。在基线时,记录探诊附着水平、出血和菌斑指数(BI和PI),并给予口腔卫生指导。两周后,重复所有测量,并在治疗后1、3和6个月进行进一步记录。统计分析表明,两组在基线时所有参数均无差异(P>0.3)。在口腔卫生阶段后,两个实验组均有显著的附着增加(P<0.04),但两组之间未发现差异(P>0.6)。在6个月时,半功率组和全功率组相对于基线测量的平均附着增加分别为0.5±0.5毫米和0.4±0.3毫米(P<0.002),两组之间无显著差异(P>0.5)。结果表明,使用半功率设置与使用全功率的超声洁牙机一样有效。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome.超声洁治时器械功率设置对治疗效果的影响。
J Periodontol. 1995 Sep;66(9):756-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.9.756.
2
Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.与使用各种牙周器械相关的临床反应比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Mar;31(3):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00467.x.
3
Quadrant root planing versus same-day full-mouth root planing. I. Clinical findings.象限根面平整术与同日全口根面平整术。I. 临床发现。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Feb;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00461.x.
4
Periodontal healing after non-surgical therapy with a modified sonic scaler: a controlled clinical trial.使用改良声波洁治器进行非手术治疗后的牙周愈合:一项对照临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Oct;33(10):749-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00981.x. Epub 2006 Aug 3.
5
Non-surgical periodontal treatment with a new ultrasonic device (Vector-ultrasonic system) or hand instruments.使用新型超声设备(Vector超声系统)或手动器械进行非手术牙周治疗。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Jun;31(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00496.x.
6
Periodontal treatment with an Er:YAG laser or scaling and root planing. A 2-year follow-up split-mouth study.使用铒钇铝石榴石激光或龈下刮治及根面平整进行牙周治疗。一项为期2年的随访性半口研究。
J Periodontol. 2003 May;74(5):590-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.590.
7
Periodontal debridement as a therapeutic approach for severe chronic periodontitis: a clinical, microbiological and immunological study.牙周清创术作为重度慢性牙周炎的一种治疗方法:一项临床、微生物学和免疫学研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(9):789-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01292.x. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
8
Effect of subgingival irrigation with chlorhexidine during ultrasonic scaling.
J Periodontol. 1992 Oct;63(10):812-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.10.812.
9
Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement associated with amoxicillin and metronidazole in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis.全口超声清创联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑治疗重度慢性牙周炎
J Periodontol. 2009 Aug;80(8):1254-64. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080403.
10
One stage full- versus partial-mouth disinfection in the treatment of chronic adult or generalized early-onset periodontitis. I. Long-term clinical observations.在慢性成人或广泛性早发性牙周炎治疗中一期全口与部分牙面消毒。I. 长期临床观察。
J Periodontol. 1999 Jun;70(6):632-45. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.6.632.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of non-surgical periodontal treatment in patients with concurrent systemic conditions.系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析评估了非手术牙周治疗在合并系统性疾病患者中的疗效。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 26;28(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05392-6.
2
Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study.手工器械和超声洁牙器产生的根面粗糙度评估:一项体内研究。
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2022 Nov 6;14(2):84-88. doi: 10.34172/japid.2022.022. eCollection 2022.
3
The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.
小型手动器械与机械器械对牙石清除及牙根表面特征的影响:一项体外光学显微镜研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jul 15;5(5):519-527. doi: 10.1002/cre2.218. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults.成人牙周健康的常规洗牙和抛光。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 27;12(12):CD004625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004625.pub5.
5
Comparison of Root Surface Roughness Produced By Hand Instruments and Ultrasonic Scalers: An Invitro Study.手工器械与超声洁牙机产生的根面粗糙度比较:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):ZC56-60. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13744.6828. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
6
Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets.不同洁治器尖端角度的超声器械操作对金属正畸托槽剪切粘结强度和粘结失败模式的影响
Korean J Orthod. 2014 Jan;44(1):44-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.1.44. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
7
Piezosurgery versus microdrill in intact canal wall mastoidectomy.超声骨刀与微动力在完整耳屏墙乳突切除术的应用比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov;267(11):1705-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1308-x. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
8
Application of ultrasound in periodontics: Part II.超声在牙周病学中的应用:第二部分。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2008 Sep;12(3):55-61. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.44096.
9
Comparative in vitro study of root roughness after instrumentation with ultrasonic and diamond tip sonic scaler.超声洁牙器和金刚石头声波洁牙器器械操作后牙根粗糙度的体外比较研究
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Apr;14(2):124-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000200011.