Chapple I L, Walmsley A D, Saxby M S, Moscrop H
School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, UK.
J Periodontol. 1995 Sep;66(9):756-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.9.756.
Ultrasonic scalers may be operated at different power settings which may influence the final therapeutic result. The displacement amplitude of the scaling tip may affect scaling efficiency or the degree of root surface damage. This investigation aimed to determine whether there was any difference in periodontal healing, as assessed by standard clinical methods, when an ultrasonic scaler was operated at full or half power in patients suffering from mild to moderate adult periodontitis. Seventeen patients with chronic adult periodontitis were entered into the study and a split mouth design utilized. Quadrant allocation was randomized, 2 quadrants being treated at full power and 2 at half power. At baseline, probing attachment levels, bleeding and plaque indices (BI and PI) were recorded and oral hygiene instruction given. Two weeks later all measurements were repeated and further recordings made at 1, 3, and 6 months post-therapy. Statistical analysis demonstrated no differences between groups at baseline (P > 0.3) for all parameters. At the post-oral hygiene stage, there were significant attachment gains for both experimental groups (P < 0.04), but no differences were found between the groups (P > 0.6). At 6 months, mean attachment gains for the half power and full power groups over baseline measures were 0.5 +/- 0.5 mm and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively (P < 0.002), and there were no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.5). The results show that the use of the half power setting was as effective as using the ultrasonic scaler at full power.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
超声洁牙机可在不同功率设置下操作,这可能会影响最终的治疗效果。洁治头的位移幅度可能会影响洁治效率或牙根表面损伤程度。本研究旨在确定,在患有轻度至中度成人牙周炎的患者中,当超声洁牙机以全功率或半功率操作时,通过标准临床方法评估的牙周愈合情况是否存在差异。17名慢性成人牙周炎患者进入本研究,并采用了对侧半口设计。象限分配是随机的,两个象限采用全功率治疗,两个象限采用半功率治疗。在基线时,记录探诊附着水平、出血和菌斑指数(BI和PI),并给予口腔卫生指导。两周后,重复所有测量,并在治疗后1、3和6个月进行进一步记录。统计分析表明,两组在基线时所有参数均无差异(P>0.3)。在口腔卫生阶段后,两个实验组均有显著的附着增加(P<0.04),但两组之间未发现差异(P>0.6)。在6个月时,半功率组和全功率组相对于基线测量的平均附着增加分别为0.5±0.5毫米和0.4±0.3毫米(P<0.002),两组之间无显著差异(P>0.5)。结果表明,使用半功率设置与使用全功率的超声洁牙机一样有效。(摘要截断于250字)