医学文献用户指南。IX. 一种医疗保健建议分级方法。循证医学工作组 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

作者信息

Guyatt G H, Sackett D L, Sinclair J C, Hayward R, Cook D J, Cook R J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800.

DOI:10.1001/jama.274.22.1800

PMID:7500513

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800.

Users' guides to the Medical Literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. B. what are the recommendations and will they help you in caring for your patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1995;274(20):1630-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.20.1630.

A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines.

BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):334-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334.

Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1995 Aug 16;274(7):570-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.7.570.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.

Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.

Users' guides to the medical literature. IV. How to use an article about harm. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1615-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1615.

Users' guides to the medical literature: XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1999 Jun 2;281(21):2029-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.21.2029.

Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST.

[Why are guidelines more irrational than metaanalyses].

Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Jul;36(5):238-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090237. Epub 2009 May 19.

Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;149(5):701-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.001.

引用本文的文献

Estimating due date in twin pregnancy by second- and third-trimester ultrasound.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;66(1):33-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.29258. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Do Meta-Analyses of Total Hip Arthroplasty Produce Reliable Results? A Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study of Statistical Methods.

Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):1936-1955. doi: 10.1111/os.70077. Epub 2025 May 27.

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide for nephrologists.

Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2476736. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2476736. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

A Bias-Corrected Bayesian Nonparametric Model for Combining Studies With Varying Quality in Meta-Analysis.

Biom J. 2025 Feb;67(1):e70034. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70034.

Levels of evidence.

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2025 Jan 18;11(4):241-242. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae047. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Is It Time Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Had a Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure? A Review.

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2025 Jan 15;16:23-35. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S490849. eCollection 2025.

Why experimental variation in neuroimaging should be embraced.

Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 31;15(1):9411. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53743-y.

Conceptualizing Sleep Satisfaction: A Rapid Review.

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(10):942. doi: 10.3390/bs14100942.

Health economic evaluation of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) to improve maternal mental health during pregnancy - a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z.

Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children's health: a methodological survey.

Environ Health. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01069-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

作者信息

Guyatt G H, Sackett D L, Sinclair J C, Hayward R, Cook D J, Cook R J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800.

DOI:10.1001/jama.274.22.1800

PMID:7500513

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800.

JAMA. 1995;274(20):1630-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.20.1630.

A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines.

BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):334-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334.

Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1995 Aug 16;274(7):570-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.7.570.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.

Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.

Users' guides to the medical literature. IV. How to use an article about harm. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1615-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1615.

Users' guides to the medical literature: XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

JAMA. 1999 Jun 2;281(21):2029-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.21.2029.

Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST.

[Why are guidelines more irrational than metaanalyses].

Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Jul;36(5):238-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090237. Epub 2009 May 19.

Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;149(5):701-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.001.

引用本文的文献

Estimating due date in twin pregnancy by second- and third-trimester ultrasound.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;66(1):33-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.29258. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Do Meta-Analyses of Total Hip Arthroplasty Produce Reliable Results? A Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study of Statistical Methods.

Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):1936-1955. doi: 10.1111/os.70077. Epub 2025 May 27.

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide for nephrologists.

Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2476736. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2476736. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

A Bias-Corrected Bayesian Nonparametric Model for Combining Studies With Varying Quality in Meta-Analysis.

Biom J. 2025 Feb;67(1):e70034. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70034.

Levels of evidence.

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2025 Jan 18;11(4):241-242. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae047. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Is It Time Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Had a Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure? A Review.

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2025 Jan 15;16:23-35. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S490849. eCollection 2025.

Why experimental variation in neuroimaging should be embraced.

Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 31;15(1):9411. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53743-y.

Conceptualizing Sleep Satisfaction: A Rapid Review.

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(10):942. doi: 10.3390/bs14100942.

Health economic evaluation of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) to improve maternal mental health during pregnancy - a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00537-z.

Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children's health: a methodological survey.

Environ Health. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01069-z.