Heresbach D, Bretagne J F, Gosselin M
Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et d'Assistance nutritive, CHRU Pontchaillou, Rennes.
Presse Med. 1995 Sep 30;24(28):1311-4.
The main aetiology of acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage in cirrhotic patients is variceal bleeding. Prognosis is determined by early or late rebleeding rates and the severity of underlying liver disease, mostly estimated by Child Pugh score. Diagnosis and therapy of variceal bleeding is currently based on endoscopic sclerotherapy and more recently on banding ligation. However, the management of acute variceal bleeding remains controversial and vasoactive drugs are an alternative treatment. At present, most of these studies showed encouraging but conflicting results. These trials show that the cyclic octapeptide analogue (octreotide) of somatostatin or the triglycyl analogue (terlipressin) of vasopressin are safer and more effective than their natural drugs respectively. Clinically, drug choice depends on four factors: -results of trials comparing vasoactive treatment to classical sclerotherapy: comparison of these two kinds of treatment show similar results concerning haemostatic rate as well as mortality especially for somatostatin or its synthetic analogue; -results of trials comparing synthetic analogue of vasopressin to cyclic analogue of somatostatin in variceal bleeding: current study designs demonstrate an arithmetic difference (p = 0.06) with a better early haemostatic rate after octreotide associated with comparable final haemostasis (after 24 hours) and mortality; -results of combination of both treatments (i.e. sclerotherapy associated with vasoactive drug versus sclerotherapy): such association decreases variceal rebleeding without improvement of survival rate; -and finally, importance of adverse drug effects on hepatic and renal functions: few studies show scanty and conflicting adverse drug effect especially on free water clearance which must be studied by further clinical trials to confirm their benefit in emergency management of variceal bleeding.
肝硬化患者急性胃肠道出血的主要病因是静脉曲张出血。预后取决于早期或晚期再出血率以及潜在肝脏疾病的严重程度,大多通过Child Pugh评分来评估。目前,静脉曲张出血的诊断和治疗基于内镜硬化疗法,近来则基于套扎术。然而,急性静脉曲张出血的管理仍存在争议,血管活性药物是一种替代治疗方法。目前,大多数这些研究显示出令人鼓舞但相互矛盾的结果。这些试验表明,生长抑素的环八肽类似物(奥曲肽)或加压素的三甘氨酰类似物(特利加压素)分别比其天然药物更安全、更有效。临床上,药物选择取决于四个因素:-将血管活性治疗与传统硬化疗法进行比较的试验结果:这两种治疗方法在止血率以及死亡率方面的比较显示出相似的结果,尤其是对于生长抑素或其合成类似物;-在静脉曲张出血中将加压素的合成类似物与生长抑素的环类似物进行比较的试验结果:当前的研究设计显示出算术差异(p = 0.06),奥曲肽治疗后早期止血率更好,最终止血效果(24小时后)和死亡率相当;-两种治疗方法联合使用的结果(即硬化疗法联合血管活性药物与单纯硬化疗法):这种联合可降低静脉曲张再出血率,但生存率并未提高;-最后,药物不良反应对肝肾功能的影响程度:很少有研究显示出轻微且相互矛盾的不良反应,尤其是对自由水清除率的影响,必须通过进一步的临床试验来研究以证实其在静脉曲张出血急诊管理中的益处。