• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Demographic and behavioral differences among participants, nonparticipants, and dropouts in a cohort study of men who have sex with men.

作者信息

Campsmith M L, Goldbaum G M, Wood R W

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Sep-Oct;22(5):312-6. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199509000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00007435-199509000-00008
PMID:7502186
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Results of prospective cohort studies can be biased when subjects selectively refuse to participate or be included in follow-up.

GOAL OF THIS STUDY

To assess the potential for bias in a longitudinal study of sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional comparison of clinical data regarding men who have sex with men attending an urban human immunodeficiency virus testing clinic.

RESULTS

Of 3,390 men who have sex with men invited to participate, 2,063 refused, 589 dropped out after completing an initial study questionnaire, and 738 participated in follow-up at 6 months. There were no significant differences in the same-gender sexual behaviors of participants, dropouts, and nonparticipants, with one exception: Nonparticipants were more likely to abstain from receptive oral sex (27%) compared with participants (18%) or dropouts (21%).

CONCLUSION

The similarities in reported activities among participants, dropouts, and nonparticipants suggest that selection bias may have limited impact on cohort studies of sexual behavior.

摘要

相似文献

1
Demographic and behavioral differences among participants, nonparticipants, and dropouts in a cohort study of men who have sex with men.
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Sep-Oct;22(5):312-6. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199509000-00008.
2
A Cross-sectional Survey of HIV Transmission and Behavior among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Different Areas of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.中国内蒙古自治区不同地区男男性行为者中艾滋病病毒传播与行为的横断面调查
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3809-z.
3
Sexual behaviors and risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国男男性行为者的性行为及艾滋病毒感染风险因素
AIDS. 1996 Feb;10(2):201-6. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199602000-00011.
4
COBA-Cohort: a prospective cohort of HIV-negative men who have sex with men, attending community-based HIV testing services in five European countries (a study protocol).COBA队列研究:一项针对与男性发生性行为的HIV阴性男性的前瞻性队列研究,这些男性在欧洲五个国家接受基于社区的HIV检测服务(研究方案)。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 13;6(7):e011314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011314.
5
Human papillomavirus infection in men who have sex with men participating in a Dutch gay-cohort study.参与荷兰同性恋队列研究的男男性行为者中的人乳头瘤病毒感染
Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Aug;30(8):639-44. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000079520.04451.59.
6
Maintenance of behavioral change in a cohort of homosexually active men.一群有同性性行为男性的行为改变维持情况。
AIDS. 1992 Aug;6(8):861-8. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199208000-00015.
7
To Be or Not to Be: Bayesian Correction for Misclassification of Self-reported Sexual Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.存在还是不存在:对男男性行为者自我报告的性行为错误分类的贝叶斯校正
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):637-44. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000328.
8
Missed Opportunities for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Syphilis Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国男男性行为人群中人类免疫缺陷病毒和梅毒检测的错失机会:一项横断面研究。
Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Jun;45(6):382-386. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000773.
9
Efficacy, safety, and effect on sexual behaviour of on-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in men who have sex with men: an observational cohort study.按需暴露前预防治疗用于男男性行为人群的有效性、安全性和对性行为影响的观察性队列研究。
Lancet HIV. 2017 Sep;4(9):e402-e410. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30089-9. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
10
Sexual Risk Behavior Among Virologically Detectable Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Young Men Who Have Sex With Men.病毒学检测呈阳性的男男性行为感染人类免疫缺陷病毒青年的性风险行为
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Feb;170(2):125-31. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3333.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Persons Living With HIV by Enrollment Status in Washington, DC: Evaluation of a Large Longitudinal HIV Cohort Study.华盛顿特区按入组状态比较 HIV 感染者的临床结局:一项大型纵向 HIV 队列研究的评估。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 15;6(2):e16061. doi: 10.2196/16061.
2
Representativeness of an HIV cohort of the sites from which it is recruiting: results from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) cohort study.代表性的艾滋病毒队列的地点,从中招募:结果来自安大略省艾滋病毒治疗网络(OHTN)队列研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 5;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-31.
3
Predictors of retention among men attending STI clinics in HIV prevention programs and research: a case control study in Pune, India.
在艾滋病毒预防规划和研究中,男男性接触者性健康诊所就诊者保持就诊的预测因素:印度浦那的一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 11;6(3):e17448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017448.
4
Do STD clinic patients who consent to sexual health research differ from those who decline? Findings from a randomized controlled trial with implications for the generalization of research results.同意参与性健康研究的性病门诊患者与拒绝的患者有何不同?一项随机对照试验的结果及其对研究结果推广的启示。
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jan;35(1):73-7. doi: 10.1097/olq.0b013e318148b4ba.
5
Differences between completers and early dropouts from 2 HIV intervention trials: a health belief approach to understanding prevention program attrition.两项HIV干预试验中完成者与早期退出者的差异:一种基于健康信念的方法来理解预防项目的人员流失情况。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul;88(7):1068-73. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.7.1068.