Kjos S L, Leung A, Henry O A, Victor M R, Paul R H, Medearis A L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;173(5):1532-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90645-2.
Our purpose was to evaluate an antepartum testing program based on twice-weekly nonstress testing and amniotic fluid evaluation in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus and to weight the test components in the prediction of fetal distress requiring cesarean delivery.
During the 4-year period of 1987 through 1990, 2134 women with pregnancies complicated by diabetes underwent antepartum testing. Of these 1501 women (class A1, n = 505; A2-diet, n = 305; A2-insulin, n = 580; B, n = 71; C to D, n = 29; R to F, n = 11) were delivered within 4 days of their last test. Categoric analysis of data was performed according to diabetic class, fetal heart rate results, and the presence of decreased, normal, or increased amniotic fluid assessment. A univariate logistical regression was first conducted with cesarean delivery for fetal distress as outcome variable by use of the following variables: fetal weight and sex, diabetic class, gestational age at delivery, presence of additional indications for antepartum testing, largest vertical pocket, amniotic fluid index (summation of the four quadrants of the largest vertical pocket), nonstress test reactivity (two accelerations of > or = 15 beats/min of 15 seconds' duration), presence of decelerations (> or = 15 beats/min for 15 seconds) during the nonstress test, and the interactions of the nonstress test with deceleration, largest vertical pocket, and amniotic fluid index. Multivariate analysis was then applied to predict the best model.
No stillbirths occurred within 4 days of the last antepartum test. However, the corrected stillbirth rate of the entire tested population was 1.4 per 1000. Eighty-five women required cesarean delivery for fetal distress. The factors most predictive of cesarean delivery for fetal distress (p < 0.05, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) were a deceleration (3.60, 2.14 to 6.06), nonreactive nonstress test (2.68, 1.60 to 4.49), and the interaction of both a nonreactive nonstress test and decelerations (5.63, 2.67 to 11.9). Amniotic fluid assessment by largest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index were not statistically significant. The multivariate analysis selected the interaction of nonstress test and deceleration as the best significant predictor for cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
An antepartum fetal surveillance program using twice-weekly nonstress test and fluid index assessment in pregnancies complicated by diabetes was successful in preventing stillbirth. The absence of fetal heart rate reactivity and the presence of decelerations were predictive of the diagnosis of fetal distress in labor requiring cesarean delivery. Ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid volume was not a significant predictor of fetal distress in labor in the diabetic pregnancy.
我们的目的是评估一项针对糖尿病合并妊娠的产前检查计划,该计划基于每周两次的无应激试验和羊水评估,并权衡这些检查项目在预测需要剖宫产的胎儿窘迫方面的作用。
在1987年至1990年的4年期间,2134例糖尿病合并妊娠的妇女接受了产前检查。其中1501例妇女(A1级,n = 505;A2-饮食控制,n = 305;A2-胰岛素治疗,n = 580;B级,n = 71;C至D级,n = 29;R至F级,n = 11)在最后一次检查后的4天内分娩。根据糖尿病分级、胎儿心率结果以及羊水评估结果为减少、正常或增加进行数据分类分析。首先进行单因素逻辑回归分析,以因胎儿窘迫而行剖宫产作为结局变量,使用以下变量:胎儿体重和性别、糖尿病分级、分娩时的孕周、产前检查的其他指征、最大垂直羊水池深度、羊水指数(最大垂直羊水池四个象限的总和)、无应激试验反应性(两次加速≥15次/分钟,持续15秒)、无应激试验期间减速的存在(≥15次/分钟,持续15秒)以及无应激试验与减速、最大垂直羊水池深度和羊水指数的相互作用。然后应用多因素分析来预测最佳模型。
最后一次产前检查后的4天内未发生死产。然而,整个受检人群的校正死产率为每1000例中有1.4例。85例妇女因胎儿窘迫需要剖宫产。最能预测因胎儿窘迫而行剖宫产的因素(p < 0.05,优势比和95%置信区间)是减速(3.60,2.14至6.06)、无应激试验无反应(2.68,1.60至4.49)以及无应激试验无反应和减速同时存在(5.63,2.67至11.9)。通过最大垂直羊水池深度或羊水指数进行的羊水评估无统计学意义。多因素分析选择无应激试验与减速的相互作用作为因胎儿窘迫而行剖宫产的最佳显著预测指标。
一项针对糖尿病合并妊娠的产前胎儿监测计划,采用每周两次的无应激试验和羊水指数评估,成功预防了死产。胎儿心率无反应和减速的存在可预测分娩时需要剖宫产的胎儿窘迫诊断。超声评估羊水量对糖尿病合并妊娠分娩时的胎儿窘迫不是一个显著的预测指标。