Pérez-Vizcaíno F, Tamargo J, Hof R P, Rüegg U T
Preclinical Research, Sandoz Pharma, Basel, Switzerland.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993 Nov;22(5):768-75. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199311000-00015.
Vascular selective calcium antagonists (CAs) show an improved tolerance and a reduced incidence of adverse cardiac effects, especially in treatment of hypertension. The effects of seven well-known CAs on contractions of single isolated rat myocytes were studied and compared with their effects on stimulated 45Ca2+ uptake of rat aortic smooth muscle cells (A7r5 cell line). In the latter test system, the order of potency to inhibit 45Ca2+ uptake was as follows (pIC25, -logM): isradipine (9.2), felodipine (8.7), nifedipine (8.5), nisoldipine (8.5), nicardipine (8.1), verapamil (6.7), and diltiazem (6.5). The potencies for inhibition of ventricular myocyte contraction at 0.5 Hz were (pIC25): isradipine (6.9), nisoldipine (6.7), felodipine (6.6), nicardipine (6.5), nifedipine (6.5), verapamil (5.3), and diltiazem (4.8). Thus, the order of vascular selectivity (i.e., the ratios of IC25 cardiocytes/IC25 A7r5 cells) was: isradipine (184), felodipine (128), nifedipine (107), nisoldipine (63), diltiazem (48), nicardipine (43), and verapamil (23). When ventricular cells were stimulated at 1 Hz, the order of selectivity was changed: Diltiazem was the least selective. Verapamil, diltiazem, and felodipine showed a highly frequency-dependent negative inotropic effect, whereas the effects of the other dihydropyridines were less affected by the frequency of stimulation. CAs show different degrees of vascular selectivity and different frequency-dependent profiles, and vascular selectivities are also dependent on experimental conditions. Selectivity is thus not necessarily related to chemical classes of drugs (e.g., dihydropyridines) or to different binding sites at the channel protein but could instead be due to varying dissociation rates from the respective binding sites at the channel in its different voltage-dependent states.
血管选择性钙拮抗剂(CAs)耐受性更佳,心脏不良反应发生率更低,尤其在高血压治疗中。研究了七种知名钙拮抗剂对单个分离大鼠心肌细胞收缩的影响,并将其与对大鼠主动脉平滑肌细胞(A7r5细胞系)刺激后45Ca2+摄取的影响进行比较。在后一种测试系统中,抑制45Ca2+摄取的效力顺序如下(pIC25,-logM):伊拉地平(9.2)、非洛地平(8.7)、硝苯地平(8.5)、尼索地平(8.5)、尼卡地平(8.1)、维拉帕米(6.7)和地尔硫䓬(6.5)。在0.5Hz时抑制心室肌细胞收缩的效力(pIC25)为:伊拉地平(6.9)、尼索地平(6.7)、非洛地平(6.6)、尼卡地平(6.5)、硝苯地平(6.5)、维拉帕米(5.3)和地尔硫䓬(4.8)。因此,血管选择性顺序(即IC25心肌细胞/IC25 A7r5细胞的比值)为:伊拉地平(184)、非洛地平(128)、硝苯地平(107)、尼索地平(63)、地尔硫䓬(48)、尼卡地平(43)和维拉帕米(23)。当心室细胞以1Hz刺激时,选择性顺序发生变化:地尔硫䓬选择性最低。维拉帕米(verapamil)、地尔硫䓬(diltiazem)和非洛地平(felodipine)表现出高度频率依赖性负性肌力作用,而其他二氢吡啶类药物的作用受刺激频率的影响较小。钙拮抗剂表现出不同程度的血管选择性和不同的频率依赖性特征,血管选择性也取决于实验条件。因此,选择性不一定与药物的化学类别(如二氢吡啶类)或通道蛋白上的不同结合位点有关,而可能是由于在通道不同电压依赖性状态下从各自结合位点的解离速率不同。