Todd C, Still A
Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, UK.
Fam Pract. 1993 Sep;10(3):268-76. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.3.268.
Interviews with 22 randomly selected general practitioners (GPs) investigated their communication with terminally ill patients. In interview analysis a conceptual distinction was drawn between objectives, strategies and tactics. When treating terminal patients, GPs expressed the objectives of keeping the patient comfortable, painfree, happy and maintaining dignity. A strategy is a plan and mode of approaching patients existing over an extended time period. Three strategies were described by GPs for use when interacting with terminally ill patients. These are characterized as 'try to disclose', 'let the patient decide' and 'avoid disclosing'. Tactics refer to behaviours used within a single consultation, as part of a strategy. Six tactics are described: evasion, denial, uncertainty, hints and prompts, euphemism and reassurance. Different strategies imply quite different forms of consultation. Thus to understand a consultation we must place it into the context of the series.
对22名随机挑选的全科医生(GP)进行访谈,调查他们与绝症患者的沟通情况。在访谈分析中,在目标、策略和战术之间进行了概念区分。在治疗绝症患者时,全科医生表达了让患者舒适、无痛、快乐并维护尊严的目标。策略是一种在较长时间段内与患者接触的计划和方式。全科医生描述了在与绝症患者互动时使用的三种策略。这些策略的特点是“尝试披露”、“让患者决定”和“避免披露”。战术是指在一次会诊中作为策略一部分而使用的行为。描述了六种战术:回避、否认、含糊、暗示与提示、委婉语和安慰。不同的策略意味着截然不同的会诊形式。因此,要理解一次会诊,我们必须将其置于一系列情况的背景中。