Rogers M S, Barclay S I, Todd C J
Unit of General Practice and Primary Care Research, University of Cambridge.
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 May;48(430):1224-7.
Problems with the provision of palliative care have been reported. Audit is one means of improving care. Earlier audits of primary care palliative care have been initiated by general practitioners (GPs) and are predominantly retrospective record reviews. Widely applicable methods for the audit of primary care palliative care do not exist.
To develop relevant palliative care standards and to devise an audit schedule (the Cambridge palliative audit schedule, CAMPAS) suitable for monitoring palliative care in diverse primary care settings.
Primary health care team (PHCT) members collaborated at all stages. Reasonable outcomes and acceptable interventions for PHCTs were identified and standards developed. Each standard was constructed to ensure uniform interpretation, and CAMPAS was structured to collect data necessary for determining whether the standards were met.
Over 50% of PHCTs (n = 20) in the health district were recruited and trained to use CAMPAS. A total of 876 contacts with 29 patients was recorded by PHCTs using CAMPAS. Considerable inter- and intra-PHCT variation was found in the achievement of the standards.
The favourable participation rate suggests commitment to audit and improvement in patient care. Overall, the standards were reported to be suitable. Although 100% achievement of some standards may be unrealistic, the level of attainment for many suggests that it is possible. CAMPAS has been reported to be a useful structure for recording assessments and monitoring care, as well as a usable audit schedule. As an audit tool, it identified areas in need of improvement and facilitated feed-back to participants. Future audit is required to determine whether improvements in care have been effected.
已有报告指出姑息治疗提供方面存在问题。审计是改善护理的一种手段。早期对初级保健姑息治疗的审计由全科医生发起,主要是回顾性记录审查。目前不存在广泛适用的初级保健姑息治疗审计方法。
制定相关的姑息治疗标准,并设计一个适合在不同初级保健环境中监测姑息治疗的审计时间表(剑桥姑息治疗审计时间表,CAMPAS)。
初级卫生保健团队(PHCT)成员在各个阶段进行协作。确定了PHCT的合理结果和可接受的干预措施,并制定了标准。每个标准的构建都确保了统一的解释,CAMPAS的结构则用于收集确定标准是否得到满足所需的数据。
该卫生区超过50%(n = 20)的PHCT被招募并接受培训以使用CAMPAS。PHCT使用CAMPAS记录了与29名患者的总共876次接触。在标准的达成方面发现了PHCT之间和内部的显著差异。
较高的参与率表明致力于审计和改善患者护理。总体而言,这些标准据报告是合适的。尽管某些标准要达到100%可能不现实,但许多标准的达成水平表明这是有可能的。据报告,CAMPAS是一个用于记录评估和监测护理的有用结构,也是一个可用的审计时间表。作为一种审计工具,它确定了需要改进的领域,并促进了向参与者的反馈。未来需要进行审计以确定护理是否得到改善。