Suppr超能文献

叶绿体和胞质果糖-1,6-二磷酸酶之间的抗原关系。

Antigenic relationships between chloroplast and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases.

作者信息

Fonollá J, Hermoso R, Carrasco J L, Chueca A, Lázaro J J, Prado F E, López-Gorgé J

机构信息

Department of Plant Biochemistry, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):381-6. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.2.381.

Abstract

Cytosolic fructose-1,6-biphosphatases (FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) from pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Lincoln) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv Winter Giant) did not cross-react by double immunodiffusion and western blotting with either of the antisera raised against the chloroplast enzyme of both species; similarly, pea and spinach chloroplast FBPases did not react with the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. On the other hand, spinach and pea chloroplast FBPases showed strong cross-reactions against the antisera to chloroplast FBPases, in the same way that the pea and spinach cytosolic enzymes displayed good cross-reactions against the antiserum to spinach cytosolic FBPase. Crude extracts from spinach and pea leaves, as well as the corresponding purified chloroplast enzymes, showed by western blotting only one band (44 and 43 kD, respectively) in reaction with either of the antisera against the chloroplast enzymes. A unique fraction of molecular mass 38 kD appeared when either of the crude extracts or the purified spinach cytosolic FBPase were analyzed against the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. These molecular sizes are in accordance with those reported for the subunits of the photosynthetic and gluconeogenic FBPases. Chloroplast and cytosolic FBPases underwent increasing inactivation when increasing concentrations of chloroplast or cytosolic anti-FBPase immunoglobulin G (IgG), respectively, were added to the reaction mixture. However, inactivations were not observed when the photosynthetic enzyme was incubated with the IgG to cytosolic FBPase, or vice versa. Quantitative results obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) showed 77% common antigenic determinants between the two chloroplast enzymes when tested against the spinach photosynthetic FBPase antiserum, which shifted to 64% when assayed against the pea antiserum. In contrast, common antigenic determinats between the spinach cytosolic FBPase and the two chloroplast enzymes were less than 10% when the ELISA test was carried out with either of the photosynthetic FBPase antisera, and only 5% when the assay was performed with the antiserum to the spinach cytosolic FBPase. These results were supported by sequencing data: the deduced amino acid sequence of a chloroplast FBPase clone isolated from a pea cDNA library indicated a 39,253 molecular weight protein, with a homology of 85% with the spinach chloroplast FBPase but only 48.5% with the cytosolic enzyme from spinach.

摘要

豌豆(Pisum sativum L. cv Lincoln)和菠菜(Spinacia oleracea L. cv Winter Giant)的胞质果糖-1,6-二磷酸酶(FBPase,EC 3.1.3.11),在双向免疫扩散和蛋白质印迹实验中,与针对这两个物种叶绿体酶制备的抗血清均无交叉反应;同样,豌豆和菠菜的叶绿体FBPase与菠菜胞质FBPase抗血清也不发生反应。另一方面,菠菜和豌豆的叶绿体FBPase与叶绿体FBPase抗血清表现出强烈的交叉反应,就像豌豆和菠菜的胞质酶与菠菜胞质FBPase抗血清有良好的交叉反应一样。菠菜和豌豆叶片的粗提物,以及相应纯化的叶绿体酶,在蛋白质印迹实验中,与针对叶绿体酶的任何一种抗血清反应时,仅显示出一条带(分别为44 kD和43 kD)。当用菠菜胞质FBPase抗血清分析粗提物或纯化的菠菜胞质FBPase时,出现了一个分子量为38 kD的独特条带。这些分子大小与报道的光合和糖异生FBPase亚基的大小一致。当分别向反应混合物中加入浓度不断增加的叶绿体或胞质抗FBPase免疫球蛋白G(IgG)时,叶绿体和胞质FBPase的失活程度不断增加。然而,当光合酶与胞质FBPase的IgG一起孵育时,未观察到失活现象,反之亦然。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)获得的定量结果显示,当用菠菜光合FBPase抗血清检测时,两种叶绿体酶之间有77%的共同抗原决定簇,而用豌豆抗血清检测时,这一比例降至64%。相反,当用任何一种光合FBPase抗血清进行ELISA检测时,菠菜胞质FBPase与两种叶绿体酶之间的共同抗原决定簇不到10%,而用菠菜胞质FBPase抗血清进行检测时,这一比例仅为5%。这些结果得到了测序数据的支持:从豌豆cDNA文库中分离出的叶绿体FBPase克隆的推导氨基酸序列表明,该蛋白质分子量为39253,与菠菜叶绿体FBPase的同源性为85%,但与菠菜胞质酶的同源性仅为48.5%。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验