Rosenheck S, Bondy C, Weiss A T, Gotsman M S
Cardiology Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Feb;17(2):213-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01374.x.
The effect of overdrive (OD) pacing rate and duration on subsidiary pacemakers was evaluated in 54 patients with third-degree AV block. They had a permanent pacemaker implanted 61 +/- 56 months earlier because of complete AV block in 38 patients and, in 16 patients because of second-degree AV block, which in the interim advanced to complete AV block. The patients had a reliable infranodal escape rhythm, with a mean cycle length of 2,022 +/- 603 msec, upon discontinuation of the ventricular OD pacing, at a rate of 40 beats/min. The escape interval and escape rhythm cycle length was evaluated after OD pacing at 40, 50, 60, 70, 90, and 100 beats/min for 30 seconds, at each rate. In 100% of the patients the subsidiary pacemaker recovered after OD pacing at 40 and 50 beats/min and the number decreased to 59% at a rate of 100 beats/min. The escape interval prolonged gradually between OD pacing at 40 and 100 beats/min, by 56%. The effect of OD pacing duration at 50 and 70 beats/min was evaluated. At an OD pacing rate of 70 beats/min there was a significant effect of the pacing duration on the escape interval. There were significant differences in the escape interval duration and escape rhythm cycle length between males and females, patients with or without coronary artery disease, and patients with narrow or wide QRS escape. However, the increase in the OD pacing rate had a similar effect on the escape interval in the above mentioned groups. There was no effect on the paced QRS duration and sinus cycle length at each OD pacing rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在54例三度房室传导阻滞患者中评估了超速(OD)起搏频率和持续时间对辅助起搏器的影响。他们因完全性房室传导阻滞植入永久起搏器的时间为61±56个月前,其中38例患者是由于完全性房室传导阻滞,16例患者是由于二度房室传导阻滞,在此期间进展为完全性房室传导阻滞。患者在心室OD起搏以40次/分钟的频率停止后,具有可靠的结下逸搏心律,平均周期长度为2022±603毫秒。在每个频率下,以40、50、60、70、90和100次/分钟的频率进行30秒的OD起搏后,评估逸搏间期和逸搏心律周期长度。100%的患者在40和50次/分钟的OD起搏后辅助起搏器恢复,而在100次/分钟的频率下这一比例降至59%。在40至100次/分钟的OD起搏之间,逸搏间期逐渐延长,延长了56%。评估了50和70次/分钟的OD起搏持续时间的影响。在70次/分钟的OD起搏频率下,起搏持续时间对逸搏间期有显著影响。男性与女性、有或无冠状动脉疾病的患者以及QRS逸搏窄或宽的患者之间,逸搏间期持续时间和逸搏心律周期长度存在显著差异。然而,OD起搏频率的增加对上述各组的逸搏间期有类似影响。在每个OD起搏频率下,对起搏的QRS持续时间和窦性周期长度均无影响。(摘要截断于250字)