Di Leo A, Bajetta E, Nolè F, Biganzoli L, Ferrari L, Oriana S, Riboldi G, Bohm S, Spatti G, Raspagliesi F
Division of Medical Oncology B, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Br J Cancer. 1994 May;69(5):961-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.186.
No published data are available concerning the activity and tolerability of intramuscularly administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in humans. To fill this gap, 19 patients with advanced ovarian cancer previously treated with at least one first-line chemotherapy cycle received the following myelosuppressive regimen: mitoxantrone (DHAD) 12 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1; ifosfamide (IFO) 4 g m-2 i.v. on days 1 and 2; mesna 800 mg m-2 i.v. t.i.d. on days 1 and 2. G-CSF (Filgrastim) was given at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day i.m. from day 6 to day 19, its pharmacokinetics being assessed in five patients. The neutrophil nadir was observed after a mean period of 8 days, and the neutrophil count was < 1.0 x 10(3) mm-3 for a mean of 6 days during the cycle of chemotherapy. The neutrophil count fell after the withdrawal of G-CSF on the 19th day of treatment. The difference in absolute neutrophil count between day 19 and day 21 was statistically significant (P = 0.0001); nevertheless, at day 21 no WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported. DHAD and IFO were respectively given at 95% and 93% of the planned dose. The pharmacokinetics of G-CSF i.m. seems to be similar to that of the drug given subcutaneously. No evidence of cumulative myelosuppression was observed. G-CSF was well tolerated and no complications were observed at the injection sites. In conclusion, if the results obtained in this pilot study regarding the activity of i.m. G-CSF are confirmed by a randomised trial, the intramuscular administration of G-CSF could become a valid alternative for patients who dislike the subcutaneous route and who are being treated with chemotherapy that does not induce profound thrombocytopenia.
关于肌肉注射粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在人体中的活性和耐受性,目前尚无公开数据。为填补这一空白,19例先前接受过至少一个一线化疗周期治疗的晚期卵巢癌患者接受了以下骨髓抑制方案:第1天静脉注射米托蒽醌(DHAD)12 mg/m²;第1天和第2天静脉注射异环磷酰胺(IFO)4 g/m²;第1天和第2天静脉注射美司钠800 mg/m²,每日3次。从第6天至第19天,肌肉注射G-CSF(非格司亭),剂量为5微克/千克/天,并在5例患者中评估其药代动力学。中性粒细胞最低点平均在8天后出现,化疗周期中中性粒细胞计数<1.0×10³/mm³的平均时间为6天。治疗第19天停用G-CSF后中性粒细胞计数下降。第19天和第21天的绝对中性粒细胞计数差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0001);然而,在第21天未报告WHO 3-4级中性粒细胞减少。DHAD和IFO分别按计划剂量的95%和93%给药。肌肉注射G-CSF的药代动力学似乎与皮下给药相似。未观察到累积骨髓抑制的证据。G-CSF耐受性良好,注射部位未观察到并发症。总之,如果该初步研究中关于肌肉注射G-CSF活性的结果得到随机试验的证实,那么对于不喜欢皮下给药途径且正在接受不会导致严重血小板减少的化疗的患者,肌肉注射G-CSF可能成为一种有效的替代方法。