Suppr超能文献

三种免疫分析法测定N-乙酰普鲁卡因胺的比较。基于多克隆抗体法测定假升高值。

Comparison of three immunoassays for the determination of N-acetylprocainamide. Determination of false elevations by a polyclonal antibody-based method.

作者信息

Laurino J P, McKay J, Fischberg E, Schwenzer K, Kaufman R

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1994 Jun;16(3):312-5. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199406000-00013.

Abstract

The performance of the ROCHE FP NAPA reagent, a newly reformulated monoclonal antibody-based fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) for N-acetylprocainamide, was compared with two commercially available polyclonal antibody-based immunoassays, the Abbott TDx and Syva EMIT. Although excellent correlation was observed between the ROCHE FP NAPA reagent and the Syva EMIT reagent, a positive bias was observed in the correlation between the ROCHE FP NAPA reagent and the Abbott TDx reagent. The bias in the TDx method was investigated further by the concurrent high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of patient samples. Insignificant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the HPLC and ROCHE FP values. The TDx system, however, yielded significantly higher (p < 0.0005) results than did HPLC.

摘要

将罗氏公司新配制的基于单克隆抗体的N - 乙酰普鲁卡因胺荧光偏振免疫分析法(FPIA)即ROCHE FP NAPA试剂的性能,与两种市售的基于多克隆抗体的免疫分析法,即雅培TDx和希瓦EMIT进行了比较。尽管在ROCHE FP NAPA试剂和希瓦EMIT试剂之间观察到了极好的相关性,但在ROCHE FP NAPA试剂和雅培TDx试剂之间的相关性中观察到了正偏差。通过对患者样本同时进行高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析,进一步研究了TDx方法中的偏差。在HPLC和ROCHE FP值之间未观察到显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,TDx系统产生的结果比HPLC显著更高(p < 0.0005)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验