Nelson L J
Yale J Biol Med. 1978 Nov-Dec;51(6):655-67.
The famous and oft-quoted maxim "Do no harm" should not be thought of as the first principle of medical ethics. The documents of the Hippocratic tradition and clinical experience indicate that a more appropriate and helpful first principle would be "Above all, be useful." The concept of usefulness implicitly rests at the very heart of medicine itself and the physician-patient relationship. The failure to adhere to this concept undermines the physician-patient relationship, dissolves the distinction between quacks and physicians, and destroys the integrity of the medical profession. The determination of useful medical treatment belongs to both physicians and patients. Any decision to initiate, continue, or discontinue diagnostic or therapeutic action has both a medical and a personal value component; the former properly belongs to physicians and the latter to patients. Practicing medicine with the intent of producing benefit and being useful to the patient is far more fundamental than practicing medicine to avoid harm.
那句著名且常被引用的格言“不伤害”不应被视为医学伦理的首要原则。希波克拉底传统文献和临床经验表明,一个更合适且有益的首要原则是“首要的是,要有益”。有用性的概念隐含在医学本身以及医患关系的核心之中。未能坚持这一概念会破坏医患关系,模糊庸医和医生之间的区别,并损害医学职业的诚信。确定有益的医疗治疗属于医生和患者双方。任何启动、继续或停止诊断或治疗行动的决定都包含医学和个人价值成分;前者适当地属于医生,后者属于患者。以产生益处并对患者有用为目的行医,远比为避免伤害而行医更为根本。