Sloan E P, Fenton G W, Kennedy N S, MacLennan J M
Department of Psychiatry, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Sep;91(3):163-70. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90066-3.
A series of elderly patients with dementia of Alzheimer type (AD), multi-infarct dementia (MID) and functional (non-organic) psychiatric illness (major depressive disorder) were selected by DSM III-R criteria and had the following investigations: a battery of cognitive tests, EEG with power and coherence spectral analyses of T4-T6, T3-T5, P4-O2, P3-O1 channels, visual evoked potential (flash and pattern reversal) and P300 recordings as well as single photon emission tomography (SPECT) using 99mTc HMPAO. Three subsets of patients were chosen on clinical and SPECT criteria. These were as follows: patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD and a SPECT rCBF pattern showing bilateral temporo-parietal perfusion deficits (AD type), patients with a clinical diagnosis of MID and a SPECT rCBF pattern showing single focal perfusion deficits or multiple areas of low perfusion in the cerebral cortex suggestive of ischaemic change (MID type SPECT picture) and functionally ill patients with normal rCBF (controls). The AD type group differed from the MID rCBF group in having significantly less alpha and more delta 2 (2- < 4 Hz) power. The latter had significantly lower alpha power than the controls. The 2 dementia groups with abnormal rCBF patterns did not differ in terms of coherence spectra or P300 latencies, but both had lower within and between hemisphere alpha coherence values and longer P300 latencies than the "controls" with normal rCBF. There were no group differences in the flash VEP P2-pattern reversal P100 latency difference values.
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM III-R)标准,选取了一系列患有阿尔茨海默型痴呆(AD)、多发梗死性痴呆(MID)和功能性(非器质性)精神疾病(重度抑郁症)的老年患者,并进行了以下检查:一系列认知测试、对T4-T6、T3-T5、P4-O2、P3-O1通道进行功率和相干谱分析的脑电图、视觉诱发电位(闪光和图形翻转)及P300记录,以及使用99mTc HMPAO的单光子发射断层扫描(SPECT)。根据临床和SPECT标准选择了三组患者。具体如下:临床诊断为AD且SPECT脑血流灌注模式显示双侧颞顶叶灌注不足的患者(AD型);临床诊断为MID且SPECT脑血流灌注模式显示单个局灶性灌注不足或大脑皮质多个低灌注区域提示缺血改变的患者(MID型SPECT图像);以及脑血流灌注正常的功能性疾病患者(对照组)。AD型组与MID脑血流灌注组的区别在于,前者的α波功率显著较低,δ2(2-<4Hz)波功率较高。后者的α波功率显著低于对照组。两组脑血流灌注模式异常的痴呆患者在相干谱或P300潜伏期方面无差异,但与脑血流灌注正常的“对照组”相比,两组半球内和半球间的α波相干值均较低,P300潜伏期较长。闪光视觉诱发电位P2-图形翻转视觉诱发电位P100潜伏期差值在各组之间无差异。