Goodrick M J, Gray S F, Rouse A M, Waters A J, Anderson N A
South West Region Transfusion Centre, Bristol, UK.
Transfus Med. 1994 Jun;4(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.1994.tb00251.x.
The aim of this study was to compare the socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors in anti-HCV positive blood donors with those of matched controls. The participants were 50 hepatitis C antibody (HCV) positive blood donors and 50 matched blood donors with no evidence of HCV infection, who gave blood to the South Western Transfusion Centre between November 1991 and July 1992. A confidential structured interview was conducted to collect socio-demographic data and to elicit information on risk factors for HCV. Measurements were made of the prevalence of risk factors and socio-demographic characteristics in cases and controls. The main results were that 45 of the 50 cases could have been exposed to HCV by previous intravenous drug abuse (IVDA), blood transfusion or medical employment. Cases were significantly more likely to have a history of IVDA, tattooing or of medical employment than matched controls. Cases with no history of IVDA were significantly more likely to have had a blood transfusion. The key conclusions to emerge are that current policies are ineffective at excluding those with a history of IVDA from the donor pool. Consideration should be given to the introduction of a policy of direct confidential questioning about risk factors for all donors, or, at a minimum, the use of a questionnaire.
本研究旨在比较抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)阳性献血者与配对对照组的社会人口学特征及危险因素。研究对象为50名丙型肝炎抗体(HCV)阳性献血者和50名配对的无HCV感染证据的献血者,他们于1991年11月至1992年7月期间在西南输血中心献血。通过进行保密的结构化访谈来收集社会人口学数据,并获取有关HCV危险因素的信息。对病例组和对照组的危险因素患病率及社会人口学特征进行了测量。主要结果显示,50例病例中有45例可能因既往静脉注射毒品(IVDA)、输血或医疗工作接触过HCV。与配对对照组相比,病例组有IVDA、纹身或医疗工作史的可能性显著更高。无IVDA史的病例输血的可能性显著更高。得出的关键结论是,当前政策在将有IVDA史者排除在献血人群之外方面无效。应考虑引入一项政策,即对所有献血者直接进行关于危险因素的保密询问,或者至少使用一份问卷。