Slobbe R, Poels L, ten Dam G, Boerman O, Nieland L, Leunissen J, Ramaekers F, van Eys G
Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1994 Oct;98(1):95-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06613.x.
Two MoAbs, independently raised against ovarian carcinoma cells and referred to as OV-TL3 and OV-TL16, display an identical reaction pattern with a membrane-associated protein in both normal and malignant ovarian cells. Also, a similar binding affinity constant and a similar number of binding sites per cell indicate that both MoAbs bind to the same antigen. Competition assays reveal that OV-TL16 is able to compete with OV-TL3 for binding to OVCAR-3 cells. Epitope mapping using a filamentous phage hexapeptide epitope library showed that both MoAbs are able to select identical phages, suggesting that their epitopes are identical or at least overlapping. However, purified polyclonal and monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies directed against OV-TL3 failed to recognize the OV-TL16 idiotype, indicating that the structure of the antigen-binding regions of both antibodies is distinct. This was corroborated by molecular cloning and sequencing of the variable heavy (VH) and light (VL) chain immunoglobulin regions of both MoAbs. The VH regions of both antibodies were found to be distinct, whereas the VL regions are almost identical. Computer modelling of the idiotypes suggests that the complementarity determining regions (CDR), with the exception of VHCDR3, have (almost) identical spatial configurations. Our data indicate that, although structurally different in their VH regions, OV-TL3 and OV-TL16 are able to bind to identical epitopic regions on the antigen, because differences in primary structure do not exclude the formation of sufficient and similar spatial structures for the interaction with an epitope.
两种分别针对卵巢癌细胞产生的单克隆抗体(MoAbs),即OV-TL3和OV-TL16,在正常和恶性卵巢细胞中与一种膜相关蛋白呈现相同的反应模式。此外,相似的结合亲和力常数和每个细胞相似数量的结合位点表明这两种单克隆抗体都与同一抗原结合。竞争试验表明,OV-TL16能够与OV-TL3竞争结合OVCAR-3细胞。使用丝状噬菌体六肽表位文库进行的表位定位显示,这两种单克隆抗体都能选择相同的噬菌体,表明它们的表位相同或至少重叠。然而,针对OV-TL3的纯化多克隆和单克隆抗独特型抗体未能识别OV-TL16独特型,这表明两种抗体抗原结合区域的结构是不同的。对这两种单克隆抗体的可变重链(VH)和轻链(VL)免疫球蛋白区域进行分子克隆和测序证实了这一点。发现两种抗体的VH区域不同,而VL区域几乎相同。独特型的计算机建模表明,除VHCDR3外,互补决定区(CDR)具有(几乎)相同的空间构型。我们的数据表明,尽管OV-TL3和OV-TL16在VH区域结构不同,但它们能够结合抗原上相同的表位区域,因为一级结构的差异并不排除形成足够且相似的空间结构以与表位相互作用。