Narayan P, Fournier G, Gajendran V, Leidich R, Lo R, Wolf J S, Jacob G, Nicolaisen G, Palmer K, Freiha F
Department of Urology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco.
Urology. 1994 Oct;44(4):519-24. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80050-2.
To determine the accuracy of the preoperative serum concentration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) plus the Gleason pathology score of biopsy specimens in predicting the presence of disease in the pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
The medical records of all patients treated for prostate cancer at eight medical centers from January 1988 to June 1993 were reviewed. There were 932 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer for whom all relevant data were available who had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomy with (n = 912) or without (n = 20) radical prostatectomy. The rate of false-negative predictions of metastases based on combined preoperative biopsy Gleason score and serum PSA concentration was analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the value of preoperative serum PSA and biopsy Gleason scores individually and in combination in predicting pelvic lymph node metastases.
The false-negative rate of metastases was 0% for preoperative PSA concentrations < or = 6 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason scores < or = 5 (n = 142) and 1.0% for PSA concentrations < or = 10 ng/mL and Gleason scores < or = 6 (n = 388). The 95% upper confidence limit for the rate of false negativity at this PSA cut-off level was 2.0%. A combination of preoperative serum PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores provided the best prediction for the false-negative rates.
For patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who have biopsy Gleason scores < or = 6 and preoperative PSA concentrations < or = 10 ng/mL (42% of our series), a staging pelvic lymphadenectomy appears to be unnecessary. The substantial cost associated with both cross-sectional imaging and staging lymphadenectomy may therefore be avoidable in this group of patients.
确定术前血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度加上活检标本的Gleason病理评分在预测前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结疾病存在情况方面的准确性。
回顾了1988年1月至1993年6月期间在8个医疗中心接受前列腺癌治疗的所有患者的病历。有932例新诊断的前列腺癌患者,他们都有所有相关数据,并且接受了盆腔淋巴结清扫术(n = 912)或未接受(n = 20)根治性前列腺切除术。分析了基于术前活检Gleason评分和血清PSA浓度联合预测转移的假阴性率。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以评估术前血清PSA和活检Gleason评分单独及联合预测盆腔淋巴结转移的价值。
术前PSA浓度≤6 ng/mL且活检Gleason评分≤5(n = 142)时转移的假阴性率为0%,PSA浓度≤10 ng/mL且Gleason评分≤6(n = 388)时为1.0%。在此PSA临界值水平下假阴性率的95%置信上限为2.0%。术前血清PSA水平和活检Gleason评分的组合对假阴性率提供了最佳预测。
对于活检Gleason评分≤6且术前PSA浓度≤10 ng/mL的新诊断前列腺癌患者(占我们系列的42%),分期盆腔淋巴结清扫术似乎没有必要。因此,在这组患者中可能可以避免与横断面成像和分期淋巴结清扫术相关的巨大成本。