• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身为照顾者与研究者的医生。

The physician as caregiver and researcher.

作者信息

Cattorini P, Mordacci R

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, Scientific Institute H San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Thyroidology. 1993 Dec;5(3):73-6.

PMID:7524632
Abstract

The physician might happen to play a double role in the clinical setting when he is the caregiver as well as the researcher for a patient at the same time. The dynamics and the ethical profile of the two relationships caregiver-patient and researcher-subject are different, and conflicts might arise: while the main responsibility of the caregiver is directed towards the patient "here and now", the researcher has a primary responsibility for future patients, the scientific community and the society at large. It has been suggested that in the clinical setting the researcher, provided that all the requirements for the ethical conduct of an experimentation be respected, has an "autonomy-in-trust", i.e. a wide discretional space in the decision-making process. While agreeing with such a proposal to some extent, we suggest that a more active and deeper participation of subjects in the experimental process, through an ongoing consent and joint decision-making process, would help in overcoming many possible conflicts.

摘要

在临床环境中,医生可能会同时扮演双重角色,即既是患者的护理者又是研究者。护理者与患者、研究者与受试者这两种关系的动态变化和伦理特征有所不同,可能会产生冲突:护理者的主要责任是针对当下的患者,而研究者主要对未来的患者、科学界及整个社会负责。有人提出,在临床环境中,只要尊重实验伦理行为的所有要求,研究者就拥有“基于信任的自主权”,即在决策过程中有很大的自由裁量空间。虽然在一定程度上同意这一提议,但我们认为,通过持续的同意和共同决策过程,让受试者更积极、深入地参与实验过程,将有助于克服许多可能出现的冲突。

相似文献

1
The physician as caregiver and researcher.身为照顾者与研究者的医生。
Thyroidology. 1993 Dec;5(3):73-6.
2
Beneficence, scientific autonomy, and self-interest: ethical dilemmas in clinical research.善行、科学自主性与自身利益:临床研究中的伦理困境
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Fall;1(4):361-9. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100006551.
3
Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.自主性、善行与实验对象的同意:对杰伊·卡茨的回应
St Louis Univ Law J. 1993 Fall;38(1):55-62.
4
Disclosing conflicts of interest to research subjects: an ethical and legal analysis.向研究对象披露利益冲突:伦理与法律分析
Account Res. 2004 Apr-Jun;11(2):141-59. doi: 10.1080/03050620490512322.
5
The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution.医学伦理学中自主性与行善原则之间的冲突:一种解决方案的提议。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1987 Spring;3:23-46.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Human experimentation and human rights.人体实验与人权
St Louis Univ Law J. 1993 Fall;38(1):7-54.
8
The suppressed legacy of Nuremberg.纽伦堡被压制的遗产。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):30-3.
9
Introduction to occupational medical ethics.职业医学伦理学导论。
Occup Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;17(4):549-58.
10
Clinical trials and physicians as double agents.临床试验与作为双重角色的医生。
Yale J Biol Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;65(2):65-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience and awareness of research integrity among Japanese physicians: a nationwide cross-sectional study.日本医生对研究诚信的经验和认识:一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e052351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052351.
2
Conflict of interest: it is ethical for an investigator to also be the primary care-giver in a clinical trial.利益冲突:在临床试验中,研究者同时担任主要护理人员是符合伦理道德的。
J Neurooncol. 2003 Jun;63(2):107-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1023959021758.