• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种剂量水平的莫昔普利与安慰剂作为氢氯噻嗪辅助治疗中度高血压患者的疗效比较。

Comparison of the efficacy of three dose levels of moexipril versus placebo as add-on therapy to hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Dickstein K, Aarsland T, Ferrari P, Todd M, Stimpel M

机构信息

Hjertelaget Research Foundation, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994 Aug;24(2):247-55.

PMID:7526056
Abstract

This parallel, double-blind trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three dose levels of moexipril versus placebo as add-on therapy to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with uncomplicated moderate to severe hypertension. Two hundred patients (aged 25-74 years) with sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 114 mm Hg after 4 week treatment with HCTZ 25 mg once daily were randomized to placebo, or moexipril 3.75, 7.5 mg, or 15 mg. BP was measured at 22-26 h postdose at biweekly visits and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h postdose after the first dose of double-blind medication. At endpoint, adjusted mean reductions from baseline sitting DBP were 8.4, 8.8, and 8.9 mm Hg in the moexipril 3.75-, 7.5-, and 15-mg groups, respectively, as compared with a reduction of 4.6 mm Hg in the placebo group (p = 0.003). The differences in systolic BP (SBP) reductions were statistically significant in favor of each of the moexipril groups over the placebo group at all trough time-points. Adjusted mean changes in sitting SBP were 10.9, 12.0, and 11.7 mm Hg, respectively, as compared with a reduction of 0.6 mm Hg in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Our results indicate that moexipril and HCTZ constitute a clinically valuable combination in treatment of patients with moderate to severe hypertension.

摘要

这项平行双盲试验旨在评估三种剂量水平的莫昔普利与安慰剂相比,作为氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)附加疗法用于治疗无并发症的中度至重度高血压患者的疗效。200名患者(年龄25 - 74岁),在每日一次服用25mg HCTZ治疗4周后,坐位舒张压(DBP)在95至114mmHg之间,被随机分为安慰剂组,或莫昔普利3.75mg、7.5mg或15mg组。在双周访视时于给药后22 - 26小时测量血压,在首次给予双盲药物后于给药后1、2、3和4小时测量血压。在研究终点,莫昔普利3.75mg、7.5mg和15mg组从基线坐位DBP的调整后平均降低值分别为8.4、8.8和8.9mmHg,而安慰剂组降低了4.6mmHg(p = 0.003)。在所有谷值时间点,收缩压(SBP)降低值的差异在统计学上显著有利于各莫昔普利组而非安慰剂组。坐位SBP的调整后平均变化分别为10.9、12.0和11.7mmHg,而安慰剂组降低了0.6mmHg(p < 0.001)。我们的结果表明,莫昔普利和HCTZ在治疗中度至重度高血压患者中构成一种具有临床价值的联合用药。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of three dose levels of moexipril versus placebo as add-on therapy to hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate hypertension.三种剂量水平的莫昔普利与安慰剂作为氢氯噻嗪辅助治疗中度高血压患者的疗效比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994 Aug;24(2):247-55.
2
Moexipril as add-on therapy to hydrochlorothiazide in moderate to severe hypertension.在中重度高血压患者中,莫昔普利作为氢氯噻嗪的附加治疗药物。
Cardiology. 1996 Jul-Aug;87(4):313-8. doi: 10.1159/000177112.
3
Long-term safety and efficacy of moexipril alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with hypertension.莫昔普利单药及与氢氯噻嗪联合应用于老年高血压患者的长期安全性和疗效
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Nov;9(11):879-84.
4
Antihypertensive treatment with moexipril plus HCTZ vs metoprolol plus HCTZ in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.莫昔普利加氢氯噻嗪与美托洛尔加氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压患者的疗效比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1997 Feb;11(2):133-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000390.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
6
Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪剂量高达320/25毫克的联合治疗与单药治疗的比较:一项针对高血压成人的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,随后进行长期联合治疗。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.007.
7
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两种固定剂量复方制剂与缬沙坦单药治疗对2或3期收缩期高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较:一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组试验
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.010.
8
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol monotherapy by baseline systolic blood pressure: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.根据基线收缩压评估比索洛尔单药治疗的疗效和耐受性:两项多中心、12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、剂量范围研究的汇总数据的回顾性分析,这些研究纳入了轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.028.
10
Antihypertensive treatment in postmenopausal women: results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study comparing an ACE inhibitor (moexipril) with a diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide).
Cardiology. 1998 May;89(4):271-6. doi: 10.1159/000006799.

引用本文的文献

1
Moexipril and left ventricular hypertrophy.莫昔普利与左心室肥厚
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):23-30.
2
Moexipril. A review of its use in the management of essential hypertension.莫昔普利。关于其在原发性高血压管理中应用的综述。
Drugs. 1998 Jun;55(6):845-60. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855060-00018.
3
Drug selection for optimal treatment of hypertension in the elderly.老年人高血压最佳治疗的药物选择
Drugs Aging. 1997 Jul;11(1):19-26. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199711010-00003.