Tung R T, Shen W K, Hammill S C, Gersh B J
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Aug;17(8):1405-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb02460.x.
This study examined diagnostic and therapeutic roles of electrophysiological testing and long-term clinical outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. This is defined as ventricular fibrillation occurring in the absence of detectable underlying heart disease or metabolic or electrolyte disturbance. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resulting from idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is uncommon. Records of all patients who underwent electrophysiological testing between June 1979 and June 1992 were reviewed. Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation were identified. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone interview in June 1992. Of 194 patients who underwent electrophysiological study after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest not associated with acute myocardial infarction, only six (4 male and 2 female) had idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. It was induced in only two patients by programmed ventricular stimulation. No sustained ventricular arrhythmias were induced in the remaining four patients. Four patients received implantable cardioverter defibrillators, one was treated with a beta-adrenergic blocker, and one received no treatment. All patients were alive at a mean follow-up of 50 months. Two of the four patients without inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias had events during follow-up. Of the two patients with inducible ventricular fibrillation, one experienced a cardiac arrest and documented ventricular fibrillation at 41 months after the index event and the other had had no recurrence at 15-month follow-up. All four patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators were alive at last follow-up, and two had device discharges.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究探讨了电生理检查在特发性室颤所致院外心脏骤停中的诊断和治疗作用以及长期临床结局。特发性室颤定义为在无可检测到的潜在心脏病、代谢或电解质紊乱的情况下发生的室颤。由特发性室颤导致的院外心脏骤停并不常见。回顾了1979年6月至1992年6月间所有接受电生理检查患者的记录。确定了因特发性室颤导致院外心脏骤停的患者。1992年6月通过电话访谈获取随访信息。在194例院外心脏骤停后接受电生理研究且与急性心肌梗死无关的患者中,只有6例(4例男性和2例女性)患有特发性室颤。仅2例患者通过程控心室刺激诱发出室颤。其余4例患者未诱发出持续性室性心律失常。4例患者接受了植入式心律转复除颤器治疗,1例接受β肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗,1例未接受治疗。所有患者在平均50个月的随访期内均存活。4例未诱发出持续性室性心律失常的患者中有2例在随访期间发生了事件。在2例诱发出室颤的患者中,1例在首次事件后41个月发生心脏骤停且记录到室颤,另1例在15个月随访时未复发。所有4例接受植入式心律转复除颤器治疗的患者在最后一次随访时均存活,且2例有设备放电情况。(摘要截短至250字)