Olson M D, Meyer R L
Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine 92717.
J Comp Neurol. 1994 Sep 22;347(4):481-94. doi: 10.1002/cne.903470402.
When the optic nerve in a goldfish is crushed, regenerating fibers can reform a normal retinotopic projection. Two processes are thought to generate this retinotopic order. One is an activity-independent process, presumed to be some form of substrate-directed growth, which generates rough retinotopy as seen in the early formed projection. The other is an activity-dependent process that generates fine retinotopy during a protracted period of refinement. This projection also displays two other behaviors. One is retinotopic plasticity, in which optic fibers can compensate for retinal or tectal ablations by expanding or compressing into the available tectal space while preserving retinotopic order. These plasticities can dramatically alter the scale of the projection. The other behavior is the formation of fixed synaptic sites in tectum. Optic fibers make a characteristic number of synaptic connections in tectum, which is not changed by increasing the number of invading optic fibers. This has been interpreted to mean that fibers compete for limited synaptic sites. How the two processes that generate order, substrate-directed growth, and activity-dependent refinement might each be affected by the expression of retinotopic plasticity and altered synaptic competition is largely unknown. In particular, it is not known how fine retinotopic order (activity-dependent refinement) might be affected by altering the scale of the projection. Would optic fibers from neighboring ganglion cells converge into the same-sized area of tectum, or would they expand or compress in proportion to the altered scale of the overall map? To explore this issue, the posterior half of tectum of goldfish was removed, and the optic nerve was crushed, thereby forcing regenerating fibers to form a compressed retinotopic projection onto the anterior half of tectum. Under these conditions, optic fibers are also forced to compete for half the normal number of synaptic sites. The effect on retinotopy was monitored at various times during regeneration by making a small spot injection of wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) into nasal retina corresponding to fibers that would normally terminate in the missing posterior half of tectum. To distinguish between activity-dependent and activity-independent processes, retinal impulse activity was blocked in some animals by repeated intraocular injections of tetrodotoxin. The initial projection was found to be unaffected by impulse activity. Regardless of activity, nasal fibers failed initially to grow to the most posterior available regions, but instead were dispersed across much of the "incorrect" anterior half of tectum at 30 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
当金鱼的视神经被挤压时,再生纤维能够重新形成正常的视网膜拓扑投射。人们认为有两个过程产生了这种视网膜拓扑顺序。一个是与活动无关的过程,推测是某种形式的底物导向生长,它产生了早期形成的投射中所见的大致视网膜拓扑。另一个是与活动相关的过程,在一个漫长的精细化时期产生精细的视网膜拓扑。这种投射还表现出另外两种行为。一种是视网膜拓扑可塑性,即视神经纤维可以通过扩展或压缩进入可用的顶盖空间来补偿视网膜或顶盖切除,同时保持视网膜拓扑顺序。这些可塑性可以显著改变投射的比例。另一种行为是顶盖中固定突触位点的形成。视神经纤维在顶盖中形成特定数量的突触连接,增加侵入的视神经纤维数量并不会改变这一数量。这被解释为意味着纤维竞争有限的突触位点。产生顺序的两个过程,即底物导向生长和与活动相关的精细化,各自如何受到视网膜拓扑可塑性的表达和改变的突触竞争的影响,在很大程度上尚不清楚。特别是,尚不清楚改变投射比例会如何影响精细的视网膜拓扑顺序(与活动相关的精细化)。来自相邻神经节细胞的视神经纤维会汇聚到顶盖的相同大小区域,还是会根据整体图谱改变的比例进行扩展或压缩?为了探讨这个问题,切除了金鱼顶盖的后半部分,并挤压视神经,从而迫使再生纤维在前半部分顶盖上形成压缩的视网膜拓扑投射。在这些条件下,视神经纤维也被迫竞争正常数量一半的突触位点。在再生过程中的不同时间,通过向与通常会终止在缺失的顶盖后半部分相对应的鼻侧视网膜中进行小麦胚凝集素 - 辣根过氧化物酶(WGA - HRP)的小斑点注射,来监测对视网膜拓扑的影响。为了区分与活动相关和与活动无关的过程,在一些动物中通过反复眼内注射河豚毒素来阻断视网膜冲动活动。发现初始投射不受冲动活动的影响。无论有无活动,鼻侧纤维最初都未能生长到最靠后的可用区域,而是在30天时分散在顶盖“错误”的前半部分的大部分区域。