Sleijfer S, van der Mark T W, Schraffordt Koops H, Mulder N H
Divisions of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer. 1995 Jan;71(1):120-3. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.24.
This study was performed to determine the changes in pulmonary function in patients randomised to receive treatment with four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) (27 patients) or with four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) (27 patients) for disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer. This enabled us to establish whether effects other than those due to bleomycin determined the detrimental effects of BEP on lung function assessments. Slow inspiratory vital capacity (VC), the transfer factor of the lungs for carbon monoxide (TLCO), the diffusing capacity of the alveolo-capillary membrane (Dm), the pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc) and the transfer factor of the lungs for carbon monoxide per unit alveolar volume (KCO) were determined before and at 3 week intervals during chemotherapy. Both groups, similar in terms of factors that may influence pulmonary function, showed during therapy a significant decrease in TLCO compared with the pretreatment value. Only at the end of the therapy was a significant difference in TLCO between both groups observed. Dm diminished also significantly in both groups during treatment, but differences between both groups were not seen. VC and Vc decreased in patients receiving BEP but remained constant during treatment with EP. It can be concluded that the Dm, KCO, and the widely used TLCO are not suitable parameters to monitor specifically pulmonary toxicity induced by bleomycin as part of a multidrug regimen. However, VC and Vc appear to be proper lung function assessments which reflect specifically alterations induced by bleomycin.
本研究旨在确定随机接受四个周期博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂(BEP)治疗(27例患者)或四个周期依托泊苷和顺铂(EP)治疗(27例患者)的播散性非精原细胞瘤患者的肺功能变化。这使我们能够确定除博来霉素以外的其他因素是否决定了BEP对肺功能评估的有害影响。在化疗前及化疗期间每隔3周测定慢吸气肺活量(VC)、肺一氧化碳转运因子(TLCO)、肺泡-毛细血管膜弥散量(Dm)、肺毛细血管血容量(Vc)以及单位肺泡容积肺一氧化碳转运因子(KCO)。两组在可能影响肺功能的因素方面相似,在治疗期间,与治疗前值相比,两组的TLCO均显著降低。仅在治疗结束时,两组间的TLCO存在显著差异。两组在治疗期间Dm也显著降低,但两组间未见差异。接受BEP治疗的患者VC和Vc降低,而接受EP治疗的患者在治疗期间保持不变。可以得出结论,Dm、KCO以及广泛使用的TLCO并非监测博来霉素作为多药方案一部分所诱导的特异性肺毒性的合适参数。然而,VC和Vc似乎是反映博来霉素所诱导的特异性改变的合适肺功能评估指标。