Tillyer C R, Konings M, Gobin P T, Iqbal J
Department of Chemical Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1994 Sep;31 ( Pt 5):501-5. doi: 10.1177/000456329403100514.
A comparison of the Roche Cobas Core and Hybritech TANDEM-E PSA (prostate specific antigen) assays revealed a large difference in the reactivity of each assay to the separated free and complexed forms of serum PSA in patients with prostatic carcinoma. The Roche assay was relatively much more responsive to the free form, but the Hybritech assay was relatively more responsive to the complexed form and total serum PSA. It is possible that the adoption of a universal standard for PSA will not completely resolve the disagreement between PSA assay on individual patient samples, and the use of separate assays for the free and complexed forms may be necessary for the further clinical development of PSA as a tumour marker.
罗氏 Cobas Core 与海布里奇 TANDEM - E PSA(前列腺特异性抗原)检测方法的比较显示,在前列腺癌患者中,每种检测方法对血清 PSA 分离出的游离形式和复合形式的反应性存在很大差异。罗氏检测方法对游离形式的反应相对更强,但海布里奇检测方法对复合形式和总血清 PSA 的反应相对更强。采用 PSA 的通用标准可能无法完全解决个体患者样本 PSA 检测之间的分歧,对于 PSA 作为肿瘤标志物的进一步临床发展,可能需要对游离形式和复合形式使用单独的检测方法。