Fukushima I, Kusaka K, Takahashi K, Kishimoto N, Nishimura T, Ohkuma H, Uyama M
Department of Ophthalmology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka-fu, Japan.
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995 Jan;99(1):47-58.
Indocyanine green infrared fluorescence angiography (ICG angiography) was compared with the fluorescein angiography (FAG) to evaluate its benefit. Experimentally induced choroidal neovascularization (ChNV), by laser photocoagulation of monkey eyes was studied by means of cast preparation correlating with findings of ICG angiography. FAG could detect ChNV more clearly than ICG angiography. However, some (2/35 sites) ChNVs with subretinal hemorrhage could be detected only with ICG angiography. In the early phase, the densely distributed part or thick vessels of ChNV could be detected with ICG angiography. On the other hand, the loose part could not be detected. Cast preparation did not show morphologic difference between leaky and non-leaky lesions with ICG angiography. These results showed that ICG angiography could not produce clearer results than FAG. However, ChNVs covered with subretinal hemorrhage could be detected only with ICG angiography. ICG angiography has complementary value in conjunction with FAG in order to detect ChNVs.
将吲哚菁绿红外荧光血管造影(ICG血管造影)与荧光素血管造影(FAG)进行比较以评估其优势。通过对猴眼进行激光光凝实验诱导脉络膜新生血管(ChNV),并通过铸型制备结合ICG血管造影的结果进行研究。FAG比ICG血管造影能更清晰地检测到ChNV。然而,一些(35个部位中的2个)伴有视网膜下出血的ChNV仅能通过ICG血管造影检测到。在早期阶段,ICG血管造影可以检测到ChNV密集分布的部分或粗大血管,而松散部分则无法检测到。铸型制备未显示ICG血管造影下渗漏和非渗漏病变之间的形态学差异。这些结果表明,ICG血管造影不能产生比FAG更清晰的结果。然而,仅通过ICG血管造影才能检测到伴有视网膜下出血的ChNV。为了检测ChNV,ICG血管造影与FAG联合具有互补价值。