Borgiani L, Cogorno P, Toso F, Gallo L, Buccaran G, Rovida S, Canepa M
Servizio di Anatomia Patologica, E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova.
Pathologica. 1994 Aug;86(4):356-9.
Measurement of DNA ploidy can be performed either with Flow Cytometry (FCM) and Image-Analysis (IA); both methods provide prognostic information in primary breast cancer. We compared the results of quantitative DNA analysis of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue from 62 invasive ductal breast cancers. For FCM nuclear suspensions from disaggregated tumor were stained with Propidium Iodide and analyzed by means of Ortho Cytoron Absolute. For IA nuclear suspensions were stained by the Feulgen method and analyzed by means of Vidas system. We found a good correlation between flow cytometry DNA Index and Histogram Type, according to Auer classification (rs = 0.65, p < 0.001) and between DNA Index and Grading of Malignancy (MG) which had been measured by Bocking's algorithm (rs = 0.38, p < 0.05). Concerning to disease free survival (DFS), flow cytometric DNA Index showed a better correlation (rs = 0.56, p < 0.001). We concluded that the two methods provide comparable results, but offer individual advantages and are complementary for analyzing DNA ploidy in breast cancer.
DNA倍性的检测可通过流式细胞术(FCM)和图像分析(IA)进行;这两种方法均可为原发性乳腺癌提供预后信息。我们比较了62例浸润性导管癌福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织的DNA定量分析结果。对于FCM,将解离肿瘤的核悬液用碘化丙啶染色,并用Ortho Cytoron Absolute进行分析。对于IA,核悬液采用福尔根法染色,并用Vidas系统进行分析。根据奥尔分类法,我们发现流式细胞术DNA指数与直方图类型之间具有良好的相关性(rs = 0.65,p < 0.001),并且DNA指数与通过博金算法测量的恶性分级(MG)之间也具有良好的相关性(rs = 0.38,p < 0.05)。关于无病生存期(DFS),流式细胞术DNA指数显示出更好的相关性(rs = 0.56,p < 0.001)。我们得出结论,这两种方法提供了可比的结果,但具有各自的优势,在分析乳腺癌DNA倍性方面具有互补性。