Song Z, Varani J, Goldstein I J
Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0606, USA.
Exp Cell Res. 1995 May;218(1):96-104. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1135.
Differences in integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion between two types of Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cells, adherent and nonadherent EAT cells, have been studied. The adherent EAT (a-EAT) cells adhere to and spread on laminin- or fibronectin-coated plates, whereas the nonadherent EAT (na-EAT) cells do not. The adhesion of a-EAT cells to laminin or fibronectin requires the presence of both Ca2+ and Mg2+. Anti-human fibronectin receptor (alpha 5 beta 1 integrin) antiserum blocks a-EAT cells from adhering to both laminin- and fibronectin-coated plates. An RGD-containing peptide (GRGDSP) inhibits the adhesion of a-EAT cells to fibronectin-coated but not to laminin-coated plates. Taken together, these data suggest that a-EAT cells interact with laminin and fibronectin via different beta 1 integrins. As determined by immunofluorescence flow cytometry assay, both a-EAT and na-EAT cells express similar amounts of surface antigen(s) recognized by the same anti-alpha 5 beta 1 integrin polyclonal antibody that blocks a-EAT cells from adhering to laminin and fibronectin. The alpha 5 and beta 1 subunits expressed on both types of EAT cells appear to have the same molecular weight when analyzed by immunoblotting. The same amount of 125I-labeled membrane protein was isolated from both types of EAT cells on immobilized laminin and fibronectin affinity columns. These data indicate that na-EAT cells express similar amounts of cell surface integrins, and these integrins, when isolated, react with laminin and fibronectin in the same manner as the integrins of a-EAT cells, even though na-EAT cells are unable to adhere to laminin and fibronectin. Previous work has shown that both types of EAT cells express Neu5Ac alpha 2,3 Gal-beta 1, 4 GlcNAc residues on their cell surface and that they both react with Maackia amurensis lectin which specifically recognizes this carbohydrate structure. Here we show that both types of EAT cells attach to M. amurensis lectin-coated surfaces, but only a-EAT cells spread; this suggests that the differences between these two types of cells in responding to extra cellular matrix molecules may reside in some differences within the cell.
研究了两种艾氏腹水瘤(EAT)细胞,即贴壁型和非贴壁型EAT细胞,在整合素介导的细胞与基质黏附方面的差异。贴壁型EAT(a-EAT)细胞能黏附于并铺展在层粘连蛋白或纤连蛋白包被的平板上,而非贴壁型EAT(na-EAT)细胞则不能。a-EAT细胞与层粘连蛋白或纤连蛋白的黏附需要Ca2+和Mg2+同时存在。抗人纤连蛋白受体(α5β1整合素)抗血清可阻止a-EAT细胞黏附于层粘连蛋白和纤连蛋白包被的平板。含RGD的肽(GRGDSP)可抑制a-EAT细胞与纤连蛋白包被平板的黏附,但不影响其与层粘连蛋白包被平板的黏附。综合这些数据表明,a-EAT细胞通过不同的β1整合素与层粘连蛋白和纤连蛋白相互作用。通过免疫荧光流式细胞术分析确定,a-EAT和na-EAT细胞表达相似量的可被同一种抗α5β1整合素多克隆抗体识别的表面抗原,该抗体可阻止a-EAT细胞黏附于层粘连蛋白和纤连蛋白。通过免疫印迹分析,两种类型EAT细胞上表达的α5和β1亚基似乎具有相同的分子量。在固定化层粘连蛋白和纤连蛋白亲和柱上,从两种类型的EAT细胞中分离出等量的125I标记膜蛋白。这些数据表明,na-EAT细胞表达相似量的细胞表面整合素,并且这些整合素在分离后与层粘连蛋白和纤连蛋白的反应方式与a-EAT细胞的整合素相同,尽管na-EAT细胞不能黏附于层粘连蛋白和纤连蛋白。先前的研究表明,两种类型的EAT细胞在其细胞表面均表达Neu5Acα2,3Gal-β1,4GlcNAc残基,并且它们都与特异性识别这种碳水化合物结构的黑果桦凝集素发生反应。在此我们表明,两种类型的EAT细胞均能附着于黑果桦凝集素包被的表面,但只有a-EAT细胞能铺展;这表明这两种类型的细胞在对细胞外基质分子的反应上的差异可能存在于细胞内的某些差异中。