• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨髓移植后用于治疗移植失败的造血生长因子:粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)与序贯GM-CSF加粒细胞集落刺激因子的随机试验

Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte-CSF.

作者信息

Weisdorf D J, Verfaillie C M, Davies S M, Filipovich A H, Wagner J E, Miller J S, Burroughs J, Ramsay N K, Kersey J H, McGlave P B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Blood. 1995 Jun 15;85(12):3452-6.

PMID:7540062
Abstract

Delay in hematologic recovery after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can extend and amplify the risks of infection and hemorrhage, compromise patients' survival, and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization. Because current studies suggest that granulocyte-macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) may potentiate the sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to G-CSF, we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing GM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2/d x 14 days) versus sequential GM-CSF x 7 days followed by G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) as treatment for primary or secondary graft failure after BMT. Eligibility criteria included failure to achieve a white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 100/microL by day +21 or > or = 300/microL by day +28, no absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 200/microL by day +28, or secondary sustained neutropenia after initial engraftment. Forty-seven patients were enrolled: 23 received GM-CSF (10 unrelated, 8 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous), and 24 received GM-CSF followed by G-CSF (12 unrelated, 7 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous). For patients receiving GM-CSF alone, neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) occurred between 2 and 61 days (median, 8 days) after therapy, while those receiving GM-CSF+G-CSF recovered at a similar rate of 1 to 36 days (median, 6 days; P = .39). Recovery to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence was slow, occurring 6 to 250 days (median, 35 days) after enrollment with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 30 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF; median, 42 days; P = .24). Similarly, platelet transfusion independence was delayed until 4 to 249 days (median, 32 days) after enrollment, with no difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 28 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF: median, 42 days; P = .38). Recovery times were not different between patients with unrelated donors and those with related donors or autologous transplant recipients. Survival at 100 days after enrollment was superior after treatment with GM-CSF alone. Only 1 of 23 patients treated with GM-CSF died versus 7 of 24 treated with GM-CSF+G-CSF who died 16 to 84 days (median, 38 days) after enrollment, yielding Kaplan-Meier 100-day survival estimates of 96% +/- 8% for GM-CSF versus 71% +/- 18% for GM-CSF+G-CSF (P = .026). These data suggest that sequential growth factor therapy with GM-CSF followed by G-CSF offers no advantage over GM-CSF alone in accelerating trilineage hematopoiesis or preventing lethal complications in patients with poor graft function after BMT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

骨髓移植(BMT)后血液学恢复延迟会延长并放大感染和出血风险,危及患者生存,增加住院时间和费用。由于目前的研究表明粒细胞-巨噬细胞(GM)集落刺激因子(CSF)可能增强造血祖细胞对粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的敏感性,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较GM-CSF(250微克/平方米/天×14天)与先GM-CSF治疗7天然后G-CSF(5微克/千克/天×7天)作为BMT后原发性或继发性移植物失败的治疗方法。入选标准包括在+21天白细胞(WBC)计数未达到≥100/微升或在+28天未达到≥300/微升,在+28天绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)未达到≥200/微升,或初次植入后出现继发性持续性中性粒细胞减少。47例患者入组:23例接受GM-CSF治疗(10例无关供体、8例相关同种异体供体和5例自体供体),24例接受GM-CSF后接G-CSF治疗(12例无关供体、7例相关同种异体供体和5例自体供体)。对于单独接受GM-CSF治疗的患者,中性粒细胞恢复(ANC≥500/微升)发生在治疗后2至61天(中位数8天),而接受GM-CSF+G-CSF治疗的患者以相似速度在1至36天(中位数6天)恢复(P = 0.39)。恢复到无需输注红细胞(RBC)的速度较慢,在入组后6至250天(中位数35天)发生,两个治疗组之间无显著差异(GM-CSF:中位数30天;GM-CSF+G-CSF:中位数42天;P = 0.24)。同样,血小板输注独立性延迟至入组后4至249天(中位数32天),两个治疗组之间无差异(GM-CSF:中位数28天;GM-CSF+G-CSF:中位数42天;P = 0.38)。无关供体患者与相关供体患者或自体移植受者之间的恢复时间无差异。入组后100天,单独使用GM-CSF治疗后的生存率更高。接受GM-CSF治疗的23例患者中仅1例死亡,而接受GM-CSF+G-CSF治疗的24例患者中有7例在入组后16至84天(中位数38天)死亡,GM-CSF组的Kaplan-Meier 100天生存率估计为96%±8%,GM-CSF+G-CSF组为71%±18%(P = 0.026)。这些数据表明,在BMT后移植物功能不良的患者中,先GM-CSF后G-CSF的序贯生长因子治疗在加速三系造血或预防致命并发症方面并不优于单独使用GM-CSF。(摘要截短至400字)

相似文献

1
Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte-CSF.骨髓移植后用于治疗移植失败的造血生长因子:粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)与序贯GM-CSF加粒细胞集落刺激因子的随机试验
Blood. 1995 Jun 15;85(12):3452-6.
2
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.粒细胞集落刺激因子与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子联合强化化疗用于多发性骨髓瘤外周血干细胞动员和自体移植的随机对照研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jun;10(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.02.001.
3
Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy.粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对高剂量化疗后用于自体骨髓的外周血祖细胞启动的比较作用。
Blood. 1993 Apr 1;81(7):1709-19.
4
Comparison of G-CSF with GM-CSF for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells and for enhancing marrow recovery after autologous bone marrow transplant.粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)在动员外周血祖细胞及促进自体骨髓移植后骨髓恢复方面的比较。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1994 Dec;14(6):913-8.
5
Hematopoietic recovery following high-dose combined alkylating-agent chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support in patients in phase-I clinical trials of colony-stimulating factors: G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1, IL-2, M-CSF.在集落刺激因子(G-CSF、GM-CSF、IL-1、IL-2、M-CSF)的I期临床试验中,接受大剂量联合烷化剂化疗及自体骨髓支持的患者的造血恢复情况
Ann Hematol. 1993 Dec;67(6):267-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01696346.
6
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) priming of high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a pilot trial.粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)预处理高剂量依托泊苷和环磷酰胺:一项试点试验。
Exp Hematol. 1996 Oct;24(12):1363-8.
7
Use of continuous infusion granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor alone or followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to enhance engraftment following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for lymphoid malignancies.单独使用连续输注粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子或随后使用粒细胞集落刺激因子,以增强高剂量化疗和自体骨髓移植治疗淋巴系统恶性肿瘤后的植入。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Jun;17(6):951-6.
8
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 fusion protein versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized double-blind trial.非霍奇金淋巴瘤自体骨髓移植后粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子/白细胞介素-3融合蛋白与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子对比:一项随机双盲试验的结果
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Apr;15(4):1617-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1617.
9
Proliferative response of human marrow myeloid progenitor cells to in vivo treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and in combination with interleukin-3 after autologous bone marrow transplantation.自体骨髓移植后,人骨髓髓系祖细胞对单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子以及联合白细胞介素-3进行体内治疗的增殖反应。
Exp Hematol. 1995 Dec;23(14):1520-6.
10
In vivo administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage CSF, interleukin-1 (IL-1), and IL-4, alone and in combination, after allogeneic murine hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.在同种异体小鼠造血干细胞移植后,单独及联合体内给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子、白细胞介素-1(IL-1)和白细胞介素-4。
Blood. 1991 Mar 15;77(6):1376-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil): bi-shRNA plasmid-based targeted immunotherapy.杰莫尼莫他特(唯择):基于 bi-shRNA 质粒的靶向免疫治疗。
Future Oncol. 2024;20(29):2149-2164. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2376518. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
G-CSF and GM-CSF Are Different. Which One Is Better for COVID-19?粒细胞集落刺激因子和粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子有所不同。哪一种对新冠病毒病更有效?
Acta Haematol. 2021;144(4):355-359. doi: 10.1159/000510352. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Successful outcomes of second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with total nodal irradiation and ATG conditioning for graft failure in adult patients with severe aplastic anemia.
成人重型再生障碍性贫血患者造血干细胞移植失败后采用全身淋巴结照射和 ATG 预处理行二次移植的疗效分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Oct;53(10):1270-1277. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0154-0. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
ROLE OF HAEMATOPOIETIC GROWTH FACTORS IN MEDICINE.造血生长因子在医学中的作用。
Med J Armed Forces India. 1997 Jul;53(3):235-236. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30727-X. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
5
Engraftment kinetics and graft failure after single umbilical cord blood transplantation using a myeloablative conditioning regimen.采用清髓性预处理方案进行单份脐血移植后的植入动力学及移植物失败情况
Haematologica. 2014 Sep;99(9):1509-15. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.109280. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Dynamics of Graft Function Measured by DNA-Technology in a Patient with Severe Aplastic Anemia and Repeated Stem Cell Transplantation.采用DNA技术测量严重再生障碍性贫血及重复干细胞移植患者的移植物功能动态变化
Case Rep Med. 2014;2014:576373. doi: 10.1155/2014/576373. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
Second unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for primary graft failure.原发移植物失败的无关供者造血细胞移植。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Aug;16(8):1099-106. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
8
Long-term follow-up of patients who experienced graft failure postallogeneic progenitor cell transplantation. Results of a single institution analysis.异基因祖细胞移植后发生移植物失败患者的长期随访。单机构分析结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Aug;14(8):859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.05.005.
9
Use of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor in the treatment of prolonged haematopoietic dysfunction after chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus bone marrow transplantation.粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子在单独化疗或化疗加骨髓移植后长期造血功能障碍治疗中的应用。
Med Oncol. 1997 Jun;14(2):91-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02990953.