Suppr超能文献

骨髓移植后用于治疗移植失败的造血生长因子:粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)与序贯GM-CSF加粒细胞集落刺激因子的随机试验

Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte-CSF.

作者信息

Weisdorf D J, Verfaillie C M, Davies S M, Filipovich A H, Wagner J E, Miller J S, Burroughs J, Ramsay N K, Kersey J H, McGlave P B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Blood. 1995 Jun 15;85(12):3452-6.

PMID:7540062
Abstract

Delay in hematologic recovery after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can extend and amplify the risks of infection and hemorrhage, compromise patients' survival, and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization. Because current studies suggest that granulocyte-macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) may potentiate the sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to G-CSF, we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing GM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2/d x 14 days) versus sequential GM-CSF x 7 days followed by G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) as treatment for primary or secondary graft failure after BMT. Eligibility criteria included failure to achieve a white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 100/microL by day +21 or > or = 300/microL by day +28, no absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 200/microL by day +28, or secondary sustained neutropenia after initial engraftment. Forty-seven patients were enrolled: 23 received GM-CSF (10 unrelated, 8 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous), and 24 received GM-CSF followed by G-CSF (12 unrelated, 7 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous). For patients receiving GM-CSF alone, neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) occurred between 2 and 61 days (median, 8 days) after therapy, while those receiving GM-CSF+G-CSF recovered at a similar rate of 1 to 36 days (median, 6 days; P = .39). Recovery to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence was slow, occurring 6 to 250 days (median, 35 days) after enrollment with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 30 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF; median, 42 days; P = .24). Similarly, platelet transfusion independence was delayed until 4 to 249 days (median, 32 days) after enrollment, with no difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 28 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF: median, 42 days; P = .38). Recovery times were not different between patients with unrelated donors and those with related donors or autologous transplant recipients. Survival at 100 days after enrollment was superior after treatment with GM-CSF alone. Only 1 of 23 patients treated with GM-CSF died versus 7 of 24 treated with GM-CSF+G-CSF who died 16 to 84 days (median, 38 days) after enrollment, yielding Kaplan-Meier 100-day survival estimates of 96% +/- 8% for GM-CSF versus 71% +/- 18% for GM-CSF+G-CSF (P = .026). These data suggest that sequential growth factor therapy with GM-CSF followed by G-CSF offers no advantage over GM-CSF alone in accelerating trilineage hematopoiesis or preventing lethal complications in patients with poor graft function after BMT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

骨髓移植(BMT)后血液学恢复延迟会延长并放大感染和出血风险,危及患者生存,增加住院时间和费用。由于目前的研究表明粒细胞-巨噬细胞(GM)集落刺激因子(CSF)可能增强造血祖细胞对粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的敏感性,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较GM-CSF(250微克/平方米/天×14天)与先GM-CSF治疗7天然后G-CSF(5微克/千克/天×7天)作为BMT后原发性或继发性移植物失败的治疗方法。入选标准包括在+21天白细胞(WBC)计数未达到≥100/微升或在+28天未达到≥300/微升,在+28天绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)未达到≥200/微升,或初次植入后出现继发性持续性中性粒细胞减少。47例患者入组:23例接受GM-CSF治疗(10例无关供体、8例相关同种异体供体和5例自体供体),24例接受GM-CSF后接G-CSF治疗(12例无关供体、7例相关同种异体供体和5例自体供体)。对于单独接受GM-CSF治疗的患者,中性粒细胞恢复(ANC≥500/微升)发生在治疗后2至61天(中位数8天),而接受GM-CSF+G-CSF治疗的患者以相似速度在1至36天(中位数6天)恢复(P = 0.39)。恢复到无需输注红细胞(RBC)的速度较慢,在入组后6至250天(中位数35天)发生,两个治疗组之间无显著差异(GM-CSF:中位数30天;GM-CSF+G-CSF:中位数42天;P = 0.24)。同样,血小板输注独立性延迟至入组后4至249天(中位数32天),两个治疗组之间无差异(GM-CSF:中位数28天;GM-CSF+G-CSF:中位数42天;P = 0.38)。无关供体患者与相关供体患者或自体移植受者之间的恢复时间无差异。入组后100天,单独使用GM-CSF治疗后的生存率更高。接受GM-CSF治疗的23例患者中仅1例死亡,而接受GM-CSF+G-CSF治疗的24例患者中有7例在入组后16至84天(中位数38天)死亡,GM-CSF组的Kaplan-Meier 100天生存率估计为96%±8%,GM-CSF+G-CSF组为71%±18%(P = 0.026)。这些数据表明,在BMT后移植物功能不良的患者中,先GM-CSF后G-CSF的序贯生长因子治疗在加速三系造血或预防致命并发症方面并不优于单独使用GM-CSF。(摘要截短至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验