Dilemmas of life and death: Part one.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 1995 Jun;88(6):311-5.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Dilemmas of life and death: Part one.生死两难：第一部分。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Jun;88(6):311-5.
2
United Kingdom Government publishes response to House of Lords report on medical ethics.
Int Dig Health Legis. 1995;46(4):570-2.
3
A matter of life and death.生死攸关的事。
Med Law Rev. 1995 Spring;3(1):1-21. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/3.1.1.
4
Dilemmas of life and death: Part two.生死两难：第二部分。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Jul;88(7):372-6.
5
Decisions and responsibilities at the end of life: euthanasia and clinically assisted death.
Med Law Int. 1996;2(3):229-45. doi: 10.1177/096853329600200303.
6
House of Lords on care for dying.上议院关于临终关怀的讨论。
Bull Med Ethics. 1994 Feb;No. 95:13-6.
7
The euthanasia debate in Britain.英国的安乐死辩论。
J Int Bioethique. 1997 Mar-Jun;8(1-2):55-63.
8
Lords reject legalisation of euthanasia.
BMJ. 1994 Feb 26;308(6928):553-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6928.553a.
9
The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia.澳大利亚安乐死辩论的未来。
Melb Univ Law Rev. 1996 Dec;20(4):1108-42.
10
Why the Lords rejected euthanasia.上议院为何否决安乐死。
Hum Life Rev. 1996 Summer;22(3):15-22.
引用本文的文献
1
The euthanasia debate: in reply to Lord Walton.安乐死辩论：回应沃尔顿勋爵
J R Soc Med. 1996 Jun;89(6):320-3. doi: 10.1177/014107689608900605.
Zotero 插件