Torres Gómez A, Jimenez M A, Alvarez M A, Rodriguez A, Martin C, Garcia M J, Flores R, Sanchez J, de la Torre M J, Herrera C
Department of Hematology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Ann Hematol. 1995 Aug;71(2):65-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01699248.
The positive role of G-CSF in hastening the myeloid recovery of patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (ALLO-BMT) or autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has recently been established. Considerable knowledge about adequate doses and route of administration has been accumulated in the past few years. Nonetheless, the optimal time to start growth-factor administration remains undetermined. We have performed a stratified study according to the source of hematopoietic progenitors (ALLO-BMT or ABMT), underlying disease and its stage, and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen and randomized patients in two arms: group A, which started G-CSF on day 0 (36 patients), and group B, which started on day +7 post-BMT (39 patients). The same dose (5 micrograms/kg/day) and route of administration were employed in both groups. We found no significant differences in the time to reach an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 x 10(9)/l and 50 x 10(9) platelets/l (medians: 10 and 11, 14.5 and 14, 17 and 16, 23 and 24 days, respectively, in groups A and B). We did not find differences in the days of fever or days on antibiotic treatment with less than 1 x 10(9)/l ANC, rate of bacteriemia, or days of hospitalization in both groups. In contrast, a considerable saving of G-CSF in B group was found (mean days of infusion in group A, 18, versus 11 in group B) (p < 0.0001). This is equivalent to a saving of 1120 $US per patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在加速接受异基因骨髓移植(ALLO-BMT)或自体骨髓移植(ABMT)患者的髓系恢复方面的积极作用最近已得到证实。在过去几年中,关于适当剂量和给药途径已积累了相当多的知识。然而,开始给予生长因子的最佳时间仍未确定。我们根据造血祖细胞来源(ALLO-BMT或ABMT)、基础疾病及其分期以及急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防方案进行了分层研究,并将患者随机分为两组:A组在第0天开始使用G-CSF(36例患者),B组在BMT后第+7天开始使用(39例患者)。两组采用相同剂量(5微克/千克/天)和给药途径。我们发现两组在达到绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)为0.1、0.5和1×10⁹/升以及血小板计数为50×10⁹/升的时间上无显著差异(A组和B组的中位数分别为10和11天、14.5和14天、17和16天、23和24天)。我们未发现两组在发热天数、ANC低于1×10⁹/升时的抗生素治疗天数、菌血症发生率或住院天数方面存在差异。相比之下,发现B组G-CSF用量显著节省(A组平均输注天数为18天,B组为11天)(p<0.0001)。这相当于每位患者节省1120美元。(摘要截短至250字)