Suppr超能文献

Ficoll-Hypaque分离法与全血裂解对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者血液和骨髓样本免疫表型分析结果的影响比较。

Comparison of the effects of Ficoll-Hypaque separation and whole blood lysis on results of immunophenotypic analysis of blood and bone marrow samples from patients with hematologic malignancies.

作者信息

Tamul K R, Schmitz J L, Kane K, Folds J D

机构信息

Clinical Immunology Laboratory, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill 27514, USA.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995 May;2(3):337-42. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.3.337-342.1995.

Abstract

We compared flow cytometric immunophenotyping results obtained by using the lysed whole blood method of sample preparation with those obtained by using Ficoll-Hypaque-separated cells on 44 consecutive specimens from patients with various hematologic malignancies. When the samples were analyzed as a group, seven antigens (CD2, CD3, CD5, CD11c, CD20, CD22, and CD34) demonstrated significantly different percentages of positively staining cells. When the samples were grouped by disease, results for patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia were discordant for CD22 and HLA-DR and results for patients with hairy cell leukemia were discordant for CD34. Most of the differences, however, were not with antigens critical to the evaluation of the malignancy. Additionally, the most frequent reason for differences in the percentage of positive cells was due to isotype control-based placement of the quadrant markers and not an actual discrepancy in staining. However, analysis of the CD34 antigen yielded eight instances in which staining of Ficoll-Hypaque-separated cells was essentially negative, but a clearly positive population was evident with the lysed preparation. This finding has important implications because of the prognostic significance of this antigen. Further studies are needed to determine the cause of this phenomenon.

摘要

我们比较了采用裂解全血样本制备方法和使用Ficoll-Hypaque分离细胞方法,对44例不同血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的连续样本进行流式细胞术免疫表型分析的结果。将样本作为一个整体分析时,七种抗原(CD2、CD3、CD5、CD11c、CD20、CD22和CD34)显示出阳性染色细胞百分比存在显著差异。按疾病分组时,急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的CD22和HLA-DR结果不一致,毛细胞白血病患者的CD34结果不一致。然而,大多数差异并非来自对恶性肿瘤评估至关重要的抗原。此外,阳性细胞百分比差异最常见的原因是基于同型对照设置象限标记,而非实际染色差异。然而,对CD34抗原的分析发现,有八例Ficoll-Hypaque分离细胞的染色基本为阴性,但裂解样本制备中有明显的阳性细胞群。由于该抗原的预后意义,这一发现具有重要意义。需要进一步研究以确定这一现象的原因。

相似文献

8
Immunophenotypic analysis of acute lymphocytic leukemia.急性淋巴细胞白血病的免疫表型分析
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;16(2):245-99, v. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(02)00004-7.

引用本文的文献

2
Infection of Primary Human Myeloid Cells.原代人髓细胞感染
Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 17;10(6):1243. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061243.
10
Differences in mouse and human nonmemory B cell pools.小鼠和人类非记忆 B 细胞库的差异。
J Immunol. 2014 May 15;192(10):4610-9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300692. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Selective loss of OKT8 lymphocytes on density gradient centrifugation separation of blood mononuclear cells.
J Immunol Methods. 1983 Jul 15;61(2):259-60. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90170-9.
6
[Effect of the method on the results of determining T-cell subpopulations].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1989 Mar 17;114(11):414-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066610.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验