Suppr超能文献

[大肠杆菌、其他肠杆菌科细菌及其他指标作为食品微生物质量标志物:优势与局限性]

[Escherichia coli, other Enterobacteriaceae and additional indicators as markers of microbiologic quality of food: advantages and limitations].

作者信息

Mossel D A, Struijk C B

机构信息

Fundación Eijkman, Microbiología Médica de los Alimentos y del Agua de Bebida, Universidad de Utrecht, Países Bajos.

出版信息

Microbiologia. 1995 Mar;11(1):75-90.

PMID:7546448
Abstract

The 93/43 European Union directive assigns to the food and catering industries the main responsibility for an integrated safety and quality assurance strategy in the food chain. Relying on hazard analysis, followed by design and adoption of control of all critical points and practices ("HACCP"). Hiatus-free compliance with such HACCP-based Codes of Good Practices is to be assessed by monitoring, recording results on process performance charts and gauging such data against experimentally established, attainable and maintainable references ranges ("standards"). Marker microorganisms are a major analytical tool for validating compliance in the sense of the EU directive. They should be expertly chosen amongst microbes usually present in food so that their, whose presence in quantities exceeding predetermined levels point to a lack of microbiological integrity of a food product. This may encompass (i) the potential presence of taxonomically, physiologically and ecologically related pathogens, markers are called index organisms; or else (ii) a lack of process integrity; in this case, markers are termed indicator organisms. The classical index organism was E. coli, introduced in the 1980's to monitor drinking water supplies. It is still used as an appropriate marker to assess the bacteriological safety of raw foods. In the 1920's the coli-aerogenes ("coliform") group was adopted as an indicator to validate the adequate processing, i.e. pasteurization of dairy products. Since the 1950's the entire Enterobacteriaceae taxon is preferred for the latter purpose because it is better defined in determinative sense and includes more organisms of significance. In some food and water supplies, processed for safety, more vigorous or more resistant organisms than the Gram-negative rods are reliable supplementary markers. These include Enterococcus spp., spores of the Clostridium genus, and bacteriophages of E. coli and Bacteroides fragilis mimicking the fate of enteric viruses under particular ecological conditions. Population surveys conducted by the authors provided ranges for epsilon-factors. Those factors were defined as the proportion between colony forming units (cfu) numbers of index organisms and the pathogenic agent to whose potential occurrence they are expected to point. Epsilon factor values obtained for thermotropic Enterobacteriaceae in relation to Salmonella spp. allow the calculation of the probability that the pathogen has been reliably eliminated by the processing of initially contaminated raw materials, when cfu's of the marker organisms remain below a reference range previously fixed.

摘要

欧盟93/43号指令将食品安全与质量综合保证战略的主要责任赋予食品和餐饮行业。该战略依靠危害分析,随后设计并采用对所有关键点及操作的控制措施(“危害分析与关键控制点”)。对基于危害分析与关键控制点的良好操作规范的持续合规性,需通过监测、在过程性能图表上记录结果,并将这些数据与通过实验确定的、可达到且可维持的参考范围(“标准”)进行比对来评估。指示微生物是验证欧盟指令合规性的主要分析工具。应从食品中通常存在的微生物中精心挑选指示微生物,以便其数量超过预定水平表明食品微生物完整性存在欠缺。这可能包括:(i)分类学、生理学和生态学上相关病原体的潜在存在,此类指示微生物称为指示生物;或者(ii)过程完整性不足;在这种情况下,指示微生物称为指示菌。经典的指示生物是大肠杆菌,它于20世纪80年代被引入用于监测饮用水供应。它至今仍被用作评估生食细菌学安全性的合适指示微生物。在20世纪20年代,大肠埃希氏菌-产气杆菌(“大肠菌群”)被用作验证乳制品充分加工(即巴氏杀菌)的指示菌。自20世纪50年代以来,整个肠杆菌科分类单元更受青睐用于此目的,因为它在分类学意义上定义更明确,且包含更多有意义的微生物。在一些为安全而加工的食品和水源中,比革兰氏阴性杆菌更具活力或更具抗性的微生物是可靠的补充指示微生物。这些包括肠球菌属、梭菌属的孢子,以及在特定生态条件下模拟肠道病毒命运的大肠杆菌噬菌体和脆弱拟杆菌噬菌体。作者进行的种群调查提供了ε因子的范围。这些因子被定义为指示生物的菌落形成单位(cfu)数量与预期它们所指示的潜在病原体数量之间的比例。与沙门氏菌属相关的嗜热肠杆菌科的ε因子值,使得在指示微生物的cfu保持在先前确定的参考范围以下时,能够计算出最初受污染的原材料经过加工后病原体已被可靠消除的概率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验