Tsiantis J, Kordoutis P, Kolaitis G, Perakis A, Assimopoulos H
Medical School, University of Athens, Greece.
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1995 Jul(28):46-55.
The pilot intervention project at Leros PIKPA asylum was resisted at all levels of its implementation. Resistance ranged from implicit and passive to explicit and hostile. It took the form of strong rejective attitudes, defensiveness, and repressed emotions of guilt, shame and fear. It was apparent in efforts to delay, obstruct or reverse the progress of the project and undermine the work of intervention team members. It was evident in the interactions of the intervention team with all parties involved in implementing the project: medical professionals and welfare services, the state and local administrations, the central and local administrations of PIKPA staff, the local community, and the asylum residents' families and relatives. It is argued that this resistance to change is due to the interplay of cultural/attitudinal, psychodynamic and socio-economic factors that are not unique to Leros or Greece. The analysis of the psychosocial processes involved in resistance to changing the Leros PIKPA asylum may offer insights to the deinstitutionalisation of custodial settings in general.
莱罗斯皮克帕庇护所的试点干预项目在实施的各个层面都遭到了抵制。抵制的程度从含蓄被动到明确敌对不等。其表现形式包括强烈的拒绝态度、防御心理以及被压抑的内疚、羞耻和恐惧情绪。这体现在为拖延、阻碍或扭转项目进展以及破坏干预团队成员工作所做出的努力中。在干预团队与参与项目实施的各方的互动中也很明显：医疗专业人员和福利服务机构、国家和地方行政部门、皮克帕工作人员的中央和地方行政部门、当地社区以及庇护所居民的家庭和亲属。有人认为，这种对变革的抵制是由于文化/态度、心理动力和社会经济因素相互作用所致，这些因素并非莱罗斯或希腊所独有。对抵制莱罗斯皮克帕庇护所变革所涉及的社会心理过程进行分析，可能会为一般拘留场所的非机构化提供见解。
