Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌的细胞遗传学研究:通过直接采集和短期培养检测到的不同核型图谱

Cytogenetic studies of breast carcinomas: different karyotypic profiles detected by direct harvesting and short-term culture.

作者信息

Steinarsdóttir M, Pétursdóttir I, Snorradóttir S, Eyfjörd J E, Ogmundsdóttir H M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik.

出版信息

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1995 Aug;13(4):239-48. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870130403.

Abstract

Chromosome analysis was performed on samples from 85 consecutive patients with breast cancer by one or more of three different methods: direct harvest, culture after mechanical disaggregation, and culture after collagenase digestion. Metaphases suitable for karyotyping were obtained in 70% of the cases; direct harvest yielded metaphases in 29% and cultures without and with digestion in 40% and 59%, respectively. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 37 cases. Cells judged to be phenotypically abnormal in culture were twice as likely to reveal chromosomal aberrations as normal-looking cells. Eight cases showed multiclonal abnormalities. Significant differences were detected in the karyotypic profile depending on the method used. With direct harvest, the yield of complex chromosomal changes was 87%, compared to 44% after culture of digested tissue (P < 0.01), and also polyploidy was more common in direct-harvested samples. Detailed karyotypic analysis was possible in 29 primary tumors. The chromosomes most frequently involved were 1, 3, 7, 11, 16, and 17. Recurrent structural abnormalities were der(1;16)(q10;p10), i(1)(q10), del(6)(q21), and del(1)(p22). Breakpoints clustered to the centromere regions of chromosomes 1, 3, 11, 15, and 16 and to the short arms of chromosomes 7, 17, and 19. Seven of twenty-nine fully analyzed cases had a family history of breast cancer, and changes of chromosomes 1, 3, and 15 seemed to be more common in these cases. There was an association between karyotype and survival: The 3 year survival was 63% in patients with complex karyotypic changes and 92% in those without complex changes.

摘要

对85例连续乳腺癌患者的样本采用三种不同方法中的一种或多种进行染色体分析:直接收获、机械解离后培养以及胶原酶消化后培养。70%的病例获得了适合核型分析的中期分裂相;直接收获法获得中期分裂相的比例为29%,未消化培养和消化培养获得中期分裂相的比例分别为40%和59%。在37例中检测到染色体异常。培养中判定为表型异常的细胞显示染色体畸变的可能性是外观正常细胞的两倍。8例显示多克隆异常。根据所用方法,核型图谱存在显著差异。直接收获法中,复杂染色体改变的发生率为87%,相比之下,消化组织培养后的发生率为44%(P<0.01),并且多倍体在直接收获的样本中更常见。29例原发性肿瘤可进行详细的核型分析。最常受累的染色体是1、3、7、11、16和17。反复出现的结构异常为der(1;16)(q10;p10)、i(1)(q10)、del(6)(q21)和del(1)(p22)。断点聚集在染色体1、3、11、15和16的着丝粒区域以及染色体7、17和19的短臂。29例全面分析的病例中有7例有乳腺癌家族史,染色体1、3和15的改变在这些病例中似乎更常见。核型与生存之间存在关联:复杂核型改变患者的3年生存率为63%,无复杂改变患者的3年生存率为92%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验