Hecht D W, Lederer L, Osmolski J R
Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood 60153, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;20 Suppl 2:S342-5. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.supplement_2.s342.
The antimicrobial susceptibilities of members of the Bacteroides fragilis group were compared using the agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. A total of 455 B. fragilis group isolates were tested against 10 antibiotics. Significant disparity in susceptibility results for most antibiotics was observed between the two methods. Broth microdilution susceptibility results were most similar to agar dilution results when a twofold lower breakpoint was used. In addition, broth microdilution failed to detect resistance to some antibiotics when the recommended agar dilution breakpoint was used. MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC values for broth microdilution were consistently twofold to fourfold less than those for agar dilution. Susceptibilities of Bacteroides that are determined with use of broth microdilution may more accurately correspond to those determined with use of agar dilution if lower breakpoints are used for interpretation.
采用琼脂稀释法和肉汤微量稀释法比较脆弱拟杆菌群成员的抗菌药敏性。共对455株脆弱拟杆菌群分离株进行了10种抗生素的检测。两种方法对大多数抗生素的药敏结果存在显著差异。当使用低两倍的折点时,肉汤微量稀释药敏结果与琼脂稀释结果最为相似。此外,当使用推荐的琼脂稀释折点时,肉汤微量稀释法未能检测到对某些抗生素的耐药性。肉汤微量稀释法的MIC50、MIC90和几何平均MIC值始终比琼脂稀释法低两倍至四倍。如果使用较低的折点进行解释,那么用肉汤微量稀释法测定的拟杆菌药敏性可能更准确地对应于用琼脂稀释法测定的结果。