Müller H E
Staatliches Medizinaluntersuchungsamt Braunschweig.
Gesundheitswesen. 1995 Jul;57(7):411-5.
The concept of hygiene was created in the 19th century although Hippocrates had already conceived an influence of atmosphere, soil and water on human health. The concept of a public health organisation, however, is a fairly recent one. Environmental and social hygiene were the two poles of the new discipline that focussed on public health. However, the ideologies of capitalism, communism and socialism as well as of social darwinism and "survival of the elite" discredited social hygiene. The decline of totalitarianism was associated with a "loss of face" of state-controlled medicine, including social hygiene. Both the post-World War II German constitution and the previous German statutory health insurance ordinance had blocked it, and hence, no Federal bill on public health was carried. The consequences of this disregard of public health are poor protection by vaccination, a gap in compulsory notification and in epidemics control and high rates of nosocomial infections. Absolutely no development of the science of epidemiology was possible whereas that of medical microbiology is choked by the system now in existence. There is a great misconception within individual hygiene by identifying it merely with cleanliness. Hygiene became a synonym for cleanliness, although that had evolved during a long cultural sociological process centuries before hygiene was established. The modern evolution of the science of hygiene shows the danger that emphasis on healthy lifestyles or on environmental protection may result in regulations and finally in a tyranny that may threaten the liberty of human rights. The so-called "principle of concern" is an example of such irrationality because there is no sensible proportion between risk and expense.
卫生学的概念是在19世纪形成的,尽管希波克拉底早已认识到大气、土壤和水对人类健康的影响。然而,公共卫生组织的概念却是相当新的。环境卫生和社会卫生是关注公共卫生的新学科的两个支柱。然而,资本主义、共产主义和社会主义的意识形态以及社会达尔文主义和“精英生存”观念使社会卫生声名狼藉。极权主义的衰落与国家控制的医学(包括社会卫生)的“颜面扫地”有关。第二次世界大战后的德国宪法和之前的德国法定医疗保险条例都对其加以阻碍,因此,没有通过关于公共卫生的联邦法案。这种对公共卫生的漠视所带来的后果是疫苗接种保护不力、强制通报和疫情控制存在漏洞以及医院感染率居高不下。流行病学科学完全无法发展,而医学微生物学的发展则被现有的体系所阻碍。在个人卫生方面存在一个很大的误解,即仅仅将其等同于清洁。卫生学变成了清洁的同义词,尽管清洁在卫生学确立之前的几个世纪里就已经在漫长的文化社会学过程中演变而来。卫生学科学的现代演变表明,强调健康生活方式或环境保护可能会导致各种规定,最终可能形成一种暴政,威胁到人权自由。所谓的“关注原则”就是这种非理性的一个例子,因为在风险和成本之间不存在合理的比例关系。