Livsey S A
R&D Section, Leicester Royal Infirmary, England, UK.
Br J Biomed Sci. 1995 Mar;52(1):71-3.
Several studies have shown that urine clarity can be used as an infection screening method. Previous publications have involved patients from specific clinics or of specific age groups, and turbidimetric assessment has often been subjective and unscientific in nature. In this study all specimen types and sources with the exception of catheterised samples were included. Turbidimetric readings were performed using a double-beam turbidimeter, followed by quantitative microscopy and culture. Clinical significance was assessed using a combination of culture results, microscopy and clinical details. Performance varied in relation to the chosen turbidity threshold level, but at a sensitivity of 94.1%, 55.7% of samples could be discarded as 'screen-negative'. The rapid nature of this screening method, combined with the ability subsequently to concentrate resources on the remaining 'screen-positive' samples, can result in an improved service at reduced cost.
多项研究表明,尿液清晰度可作为一种感染筛查方法。以往的出版物涉及特定诊所的患者或特定年龄组的患者,而比浊法评估在本质上往往具有主观性且不科学。在本研究中,除导尿管采集的样本外,纳入了所有类型和来源的标本。使用双光束比浊仪进行比浊读数,随后进行定量显微镜检查和培养。结合培养结果、显微镜检查和临床细节评估临床意义。性能因所选浊度阈值水平而异,但在灵敏度为94.1%时,55.7%的样本可作为“筛查阴性”被丢弃。这种筛查方法的快速性,再加上随后能够将资源集中在其余“筛查阳性”样本上,可在降低成本的情况下改善服务。