• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Splints: mechanics versus convention.

作者信息

Fess E E

机构信息

Hand Research, Zionsville, Indiana 46077, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 1995 Apr-Jun;8(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80309-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80309-7
PMID:7550622
Abstract

Splints are specialized engineering machines that are created to solve specific upper-extremity problems. Astute manipulation of mechanical concepts increases splint efficiency, enhances patient comfort and function, and improves splint durability, while diminishing cost and frustration. Creation of splint designs should be based on mechanical fact rather than on mode-of-the-day bias. Those who are responsible for the treatment of upper-extremity dysfunction and use splinting as a treatment modality must have a thorough working understanding of the engineering concepts involved. Splinting is both science and art but the ultimate criterium is does it work mechanically? If a splint does not work mechanically, then there is no reason for its application. The insight provided by understanding engineering concepts opens new horizons in patient treatment for those who take the time to learn.

摘要

相似文献

1
Splints: mechanics versus convention.
J Hand Ther. 1995 Apr-Jun;8(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80309-7.
2
Comparative strength of elbow splint designs: a new splint design as a stronger alternative to posterior splints.肘部夹板设计的比较强度:新型夹板设计作为后夹板的更强替代方案。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Apr;28(4):e125-e130. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.015. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs.扳机指的治疗:两种夹板设计的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Feb;37(2):243-9, 249.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.038. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
4
[A comparative study of the "Levame" type extension splint and the "Low Profile" type extension splint: impact on therapeutic indications].“Levame”型伸展夹板与“Low Profile”型伸展夹板的比较研究:对治疗适应症的影响
Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1994;13(5):308-16. doi: 10.1016/s0753-9053(05)80066-3.
5
The dynamic intraphalangeal final flexion splint.动态指骨终末屈曲夹板
J Hand Ther. 2001 Jan-Mar;14(1):51-2. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80026-0.
6
Alternative splinting approach for proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contractures: no-profile static-progressive splinting and cylinder splint combo.近端指间关节屈曲挛缩的替代夹板治疗方法:无轮廓静态渐进式夹板与圆柱夹板组合
J Hand Ther. 2009 Jul-Sep;22(3):288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.04.001.
7
A comparative study of splint effectiveness in limiting forearm rotation.夹板对限制前臂旋转效果的对比研究。
J Hand Ther. 2010 Jul-Sep;23(3):241-7; quiz 248. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
8
[Conservative treatment of stable finger joint dislocations using the Stack splint].[使用斯塔克夹板对稳定型手指关节脱位进行保守治疗]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 Sep;28(5):246-8.
9
Splinting strategies and controversies.夹板固定策略与争议
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):392-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000176886.63559.8b.
10
A comparison of high-profile and low-profile dynamic mobilization splint designs.高轮廓与低轮廓动态活动夹板设计的比较。
J Hand Ther. 2004 Jul-Sep;17(3):335-43. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.04.003.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of early orthotic intervention in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: Study protocol for phase II double-blinded randomised controlled trial.早期矫形器干预在创伤后肘关节挛缩管理中的作用:II期双盲随机对照试验的研究方案
Hand Ther. 2025 Mar;30(1):46-57. doi: 10.1177/17589983241292827. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Complications of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries: Prevention and Treatment.近端指间关节损伤的并发症:预防与治疗
Hand Clin. 2018 May;34(2):267-288. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.014.
3
EFFECT OF USING WRIST ORTHOSES ON FOREARM FLEXOR AND EXTENSOR MUSCLE ACTIVATION.
使用手腕矫形器对前臂屈肌和伸肌激活的影响。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;45(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30220-2. eCollection 2010 Jan.